CHAPTER X
INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT
3Convention on Transit Trade of Land-locked StatesNew York, 8 July 19659 June 1967, in accordance with article 20.9 June 1967, No. 8641Signatories27Parties43United Nations, <i>Treaty Series </i>, vol. 597, p. 3.The Convention was adopted by the United Nations Conference on Transit Trade of Land-locked Countries, which had been convened pursuant to the decision of the General Assembly of the United Nations taken at its 1328th plenary meeting on 10 February 1965. The Conference met at the Headquarters of the United Nations in New York from 7 June to 8 July 1965.
ParticipantSignatureRatification, Accession(a), Succession(d)Afghanistan 8 Jul 1965 Argentina29 Dec 1965 Armenia24 May 2013 aAustralia 2 May 1972 aBelarus28 Dec 1965 11 Jul 1972 Belgium30 Dec 1965 21 Apr 1970 Bolivia (Plurinational State of)29 Dec 1965 Brazil 4 Aug 1965 Burkina Faso23 Mar 1987 aBurundi 1 May 1968 aCameroon10 Aug 1965 Central African Republic30 Dec 1965 9 Aug 1989 Chad 2 Mar 1967 aChile20 Dec 1965 25 Oct 1972 Congo11 Jun 2014 aCroatia<superscript>1</superscript> 3 Aug 1992 dCzech Republic<superscript>2</superscript>30 Sep 1993 dDenmark26 Mar 1969 aEswatini26 May 1969 aFinland22 Jan 1971 aGeorgia 2 Jun 1999 aGermany<superscript>3</superscript>20 Dec 1965 Holy See30 Dec 1965 Hungary30 Dec 1965 20 Sep 1967 Italy31 Dec 1965 Kazakhstan 1 Nov 2007 aLao People's Democratic Republic 8 Jul 1965 29 Dec 1967 Lesotho28 May 1969 aLuxembourg28 Dec 1965 Malawi12 Dec 1966 aMali11 Oct 1967 aMongolia26 Jul 1966 aMontenegro<superscript>4</superscript>23 Oct 2006 dNepal 9 Jul 1965 22 Aug 1966 Netherlands (Kingdom of the)30 Dec 1965 30 Nov 1971 Niger 3 Jun 1966 aNigeria16 May 1966 aNorway17 Sep 1968 aParaguay23 Dec 1965 Russian Federation28 Dec 1965 21 Jul 1972 Rwanda23 Jul 1965 13 Aug 1968 San Marino23 Jul 1965 12 Jun 1968 Senegal 5 Aug 1985 aSerbia<superscript>1</superscript>12 Mar 2001 dSlovakia<superscript>2</superscript>28 May 1993 dSpain 5 May 2010 aSudan11 Aug 1965 Sweden16 Jun 1971 aSwitzerland10 Dec 1965 Tajikistan13 Jul 2011 aTürkiye25 Mar 1969 aUganda21 Dec 1965 Ukraine31 Dec 1965 21 Jul 1972 United States of America30 Dec 1965 29 Oct 1968 Uzbekistan 7 Feb 1996 aZambia23 Dec 1965 2 Dec 1966
Declarations and Reservations(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations and reservations were madeupon ratification, accession or succession.)BelarusDeclaration and reservation made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:The Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic considers it necessary to draw attention to the discriminatory nature of articles 17, 19, 22 and 23 of the Convention, under which a number of States are deprived of the opportunity to become Parties to the Convention. The Convention deals with matters that affect the interests of all States, and it should therefore be open for participation by all States. According to the principle of sovereign equality, no States have the right to exclude other States from participation in a Convention of this type.The Government of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16 of the Convention on Transit Trade of Land-locked States, under which members of the arbitration commission may be appointed by the President of the International Court of Justice, and declares that, in each individual case, the consent of the contending States is necessary for the appointment of members of the arbitration commission by the President of the International Court of Justice.BelgiumDeclaration made upon signature and confirmed upon ratifica- tion:1. With regard to the application of article 3 of the Conven- tion, the Belgian Government considers that the exemption relates exclusively to duties or taxes on imports or exports, and not to taxes on transactions, such as the Belgian tax on transport and auxiliary services, which also apply to internal trade.2. Belgium can apply article 4, paragraph 1, only in so far as State-owned means of transport and handling equipment are concerned.Upon signature (the reservation referred to below was not made upon ratification):3. The Belgian Government intends, upon depositing its instrument of ratification of the Convention, to make a reserva- tion concerning the rights and obligations of Belgium arising from its adherence to certain international treaties relating to economic matters or trade.Bolivia (Plurinational State of)Upon signature:I have been instructed by my Government to place on record the Bolivian view, which is already to be found in the records of the Conference, that Bolivia is not a land-locked State but a nation which is deprived by temporary circumstances of access to the sea across its own coast and that unrestricted and uncondi- tional freedom of transit must be recognized in international law as an inherent right of enclosed territories and countries for reasons of justice and because of the need to facilitate such transit as a contribution to general progress on a basis of equality.Bolivia will on no occasion fail to maintain these views, which are inherent in national sovereignty, and, by signing the Convention, will give evidence of its willingness to co-operate with the United Nations and the developing countries without a sea-coast.ChileReservation with respect to article 16 made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:In any dispute with American countries over the interpreta- tion or implementation of this Convention, Chile shall proceed in accordance with whatever inter-American instruments concerning the peaceful settlement of disputes may be binding both on Chile and on the other American country.Czech Republic<superscript>2</superscript>Germany<i>"In respect of article 2, paragraph 1, article 5 and article 7 </i>:"The Federal Republic of Germany starts from the assump- tion that normal frontier controls which, in accordance with international agreements and with existing national legislation, are carried through in an adequate and non-discriminatory manner, meet the requirements of article 2, paragraph 1, article 5 and article 7.<i>"In respect of article 2, paragraph 2 </i>:"The Federal Republic of Germany understands this provi- sion to imply that, as long as agreements according to article 2, paragraph 2, have not been concluded, the national regulations of the transit state will apply.<i>"In respect of article 4, paragraph 1 and article 6, paragraph 1 </i>:"The Federal Republic of Germany is not in a position to assume obligations as provided for in article 4, paragraph 1 and in article 6, paragraph 1. Considering transport conditions in the Federal Republic of Germany, however, it may be taken for granted that sufficient means of transport as well as handling equipment and storage facilities will be available for traffic in transit. Should difficulties arise nevertheless, the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany would be prepared to seek remedies." <i>In respect of article 4, paragraph 2 and article 6, paragraph 2 </i>:"The Federal Republic of Germany is not in a position to assume obligations as contained in article 4, paragraph 2 and article 6, paragraph 2.The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany is, however, prepared, within the scope of its possibi- lities, to use its influence as regards tariffs and charges so as to facilitate traffic in transit as much as possible."Hungary<superscript>5</superscript>The Hungarian People's Republic is of the opinion that articles 17, 19, 22 and 23 of the Convention, which debar a number of States the right to become parties to the Convention, are of a discriminatory nature. The Convention is a general multilateral international treaty, and therefore, as follows from the principles of international law, every State shall have the right to become a party to it.ItalyThe Permanent Representative of Italy wishes to notify the Secretary-General that the Italian Government intends to enter specific reservations to the Convention on depositing its instrument of ratification.LuxembourgThe Government of Luxembourg envisages the possibility, on depositing the instrument of ratification of the Convention on Transit Trade of Land-locked States, of entering a reservation relating to its membership in regional economic unions or common markets.Mongolia<superscript>6</superscript>The Government of the Mongolian People's Republic deems it essential to draw attention to the discriminatory nature of the provisions of articles 17, 19, 22 and 23 of the Convention, under which a number of States are excluded from participation in this Convention. The Convention deals with matters of interest to all States and should therefore be open for participation by all States.Russian FederationDeclaration and reservation made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics considers it necess- ary to draw attention to the discriminatory nature of articles 17, 19, 22 and 23 of the Convention under which a number of States are deprived of the opportunity to become Parties to the Convention. The Convention deals with matters that affect the interests of all States, and it should therefore be open for participation by all States. According to the principle of sovereign equality, no States have the right to exclude other States from participation in a Convention of this type.The Government of the Soviet Socialist Republics does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16 of the Convention on Transit Trade of Land-locked States, under which members of the arbitration commission may be appointed by the President of the International Court of Justice, and declares that, in each individual case, the consent of the contending States is necessary for the appointment of members of the arbitration commission by the President of the International Court of Justice.Slovakia<superscript>2</superscript>Sudan"The Government of the Republic of the Sudan will not consider itself bound by the third sentence of article 2, paragraph 1, of the Convention in respect of the passage across its territory of goods destined to or coming from South Africa or Portugal or goods the ownership of which could be claimed by South Africa or Portugal. The reservation is made in accordance with the spirit of Security Council resolution S/5773, in which the Security Council condemned the apartheid Policies of the Government of the Republic of South Africa, resolution A/AC.109/124 in which the Special Committee condemned the colonial policy of Portugal and its persistent refusal to carry out the resolutions of the General Assembly, the Security Council and the Special Committee, and resolution CM/Res.6 (1) of the Council of Ministers of the Organization of African Unity. The reservations will remain in force pending the ending of the prevailing situation in South Africa and the Portuguese colonies."Nor will the Republic of the Sudan, as a member of the Arab League, consider itself bound by the same provision in respect of the passage across its territory of goods destined for or coming from Israel."UkraineDeclaration and reservation made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic considers it necessary to draw attention to the discriminatory nature of articles 17, 19, 22 and 23 of the Convention, under which a number of States are deprived of the opportunity to become Parties to the Convention. The Convention deals with matters that affect the interests of all States, and it should therefore be open for participation by all States. According to the principle of sovereign equality, no States have the right to exclude other States from participation in a Convention of this type.The Government of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16 of the Convention on Transit Trade of Land-locked States, under which members of the arbitration commission may be appointed by the President of the International Court of Justice, and declares that, in each individual case, the consent of the contending States is necessary for the appointment of members of the arbitration commission by the President of the International Court of Justice.1The former Yugoslavia had signed and ratified the Convention on 8 July 1965 and 10 May 1967, respectively. See also note 1 under “Bosnia and Herzegovina", "Croatia", "former Yugoslavia", "Slovenia", "The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" and "Yugoslavia" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.2Czechoslovakia had signed and ratified the Convention on 10 December 1965 and 8 August 1967, respectively, with reservations made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification. For the text of the reservations, see United Nations, <i>Treaty Series </i>, vol. 597, p. 111. See also note 1 under “Czech Republic” and note 1 under “Slovakia” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.3See note 2 under “Germany” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.4See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.5In a communication received on 8 December 1989, the Government of Hungary notified the Secretary-General that it had decided to withdraw the reservation relating to article 16 made upon ratification. For the text of the said reservation, see United Nations, <i>Treaty Series </i>, vol. 605, p. 399.6In a communication received on 19 July 1990, the Government of Mongolia notified the Secretary-General that it had decided to withdraw the reservation relating to article 16 made upon ratification. For the text of the said reservation, see United Nations, <i>Treaty Series </i>, vol. 593, p. 137.