TO THE 1979 CONVENTION
ON LONG-RANGE
TRANSBOUNDARY AIR POLLUTION
TO ABATE ACIDIFICATION,
EUTROPHICATION
AND
GROUND-LEVEL
OZONE
UNITED NATIONS
1999
The Parties,
Determined
to implement the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution,
Aware
that nitrogen oxides, sulphur, volatile organic compounds and reduced nitrogen
compounds have been associated with adverse effects on human health and
the environment,
Concerned
that critical loads of acidification, critical loads of nutrient nitrogen
and critical levels of ozone for human health and vegetation are still
exceeded in many areas of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe's
region,
Concerned
also that emitted nitrogen oxides, sulphur and volatile organic compounds,
as well as secondary pollutants such as ozone and the reaction products
of ammonia, are transported in the atmosphere over long distances and may
have adverse transboundary effects,
Recognizing
that emissions from Parties within the United Nations Economic Commission
for Europe's region contribute to air pollution on the hemispheric and
global scales, and recognizing the potential for transport between continents
and the need for further study with regard to that potential,
Recognizing
also that Canada and the United States of America are bilaterally negotiating
reductions of emissions of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds
to address the transboundary ozone effect,
Recognizing
furthermore that Canada will undertake further reductions of emissions
of sulphur by 2010 through the implementation of the Canada-wide Acid Rain
Strategy for Post-2000, and that the United States is committed to the
implementation of a nitrogen oxides reduction programme in the eastern
United States and to the reduction in emissions necessary to meet its national
ambient air quality standards for particulate matter,
Resolved
to apply a multi-effect, multi-pollutant approach to preventing or minimizing
the exceedances of critical loads and levels,
Taking
into account the emissions from certain existing activities and installations
responsible for present air pollution levels and the development of future
activities and installations,
Aware
that techniques and management practices are available to reduce emissions
of these substances,
Resolved
to take measures to anticipate, prevent or minimize emissions of these
substances, taking into account the application of the precautionary approach
as set forth in principle 15 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and
Development,
Reaffirming
that States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations
and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit
their own resources pursuant to their own environmental and developmental
policies, and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their
jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other
States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction,
Conscious
of the need for a cost-effective regional approach to combating air pollution
that takes account of the variations in effects and abatement costs between
countries,
Noting
the important contribution of the private and non-governmental sectors
to knowledge of the effects associated with these substances and available
abatement techniques, and their role in assisting in the reduction of emissions
to the atmosphere,
Bearing
in mind that measures taken to reduce emissions of sulphur, nitrogen
oxides, ammonia and volatile organic compounds should not constitute a
means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction
on international competition and trade,
Taking
into consideration best available scientific and technical knowledge
and data on emissions, atmospheric processes and effects on human health
and the environment of these substances, as well as on abatement costs,
and acknowledging the need to improve this knowledge and to continue scientific
and technical cooperation to further understanding of these issues,
Noting
that under the Protocol concerning the Control of Emissions of Nitrogen
Oxides or their Transboundary Fluxes, adopted at Sofia on 31 October 1988,
and the Protocol concerning the Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic
Compounds or their Transboundary Fluxes, adopted at Geneva on 18 November
1991, there is already provision to control emissions of nitrogen oxides
and volatile organic compounds, and that the technical annexes to both
those Protocols already contain technical guidance for reducing these emissions,
Noting
also that under the Protocol on Further Reduction of Sulphur Emissions,
adopted at Oslo on 14 June 1994, there is already provision to reduce sulphur
emissions in order to contribute to the abatement of acid deposition by
diminishing the exceedances of critical sulphur depositions, which have
been derived from critical loads of acidity according to the contribution
of oxidized sulphur compounds to the total acid deposition in 1990,
Noting
furthermore that this Protocol is the first agreement under the Convention
to deal specifically with reduced nitrogen compounds,
Bearing in mind that reducing the emissions of these substances
may provide additional benefits for the control of other pollutants, including
in particular transboundary secondary particulate aerosols, which contribute
to human health effects associated with exposure to airborne particulates,
Bearing
in mind also the need to avoid, in so far as possible, taking measures
for the achievement of the objectives of this Protocol that aggravate other
health and environment-related problems,
Noting
that measures taken to reduce the emissions of nitrogen oxides and ammonia
should involve consideration of the full biogeochemical nitrogen cycle
and, so far as possible, not increase emissions of reactive nitrogen including
nitrous oxide which could aggravate other nitrogen-related problems,
Aware
that methane and carbon monoxide emitted by human activities contribute,
in the presence of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds, to the
formation of tropospheric ozone, and
Aware
also of the commitments that Parties have assumed under the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,
Have
agreed as follows:
Article 1
DEFINITIONS
For
the purposes of the present Protocol,
1. "Convention" means
the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, adopted at Geneva
on 13 November 1979;
2. "EMEP" means the
Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of Long-range Transmission
of Air Pollutants in Europe;
3. "Executive Body"
means the Executive Body for the Convention constituted under article 10,
paragraph 1, of the Convention;
4. "Commission" means
the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe;
5. "Parties" means,
unless the context otherwise requires, the Parties to the present Protocol;
6. "Geographical scope
of EMEP" means the area defined in article 1, paragraph 4, of the Protocol
to the 1979 Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution on Long-term
Financing of the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of
the Long-range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe (EMEP), adopted
at Geneva on 28 September 1984;
7. "Emission" means
the release of a substance from a point or diffuse source into the atmosphere;
8. "Nitrogen oxides"
means nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide, expressed as nitrogen dioxide
(NO2);
9. "Reduced nitrogen
compounds" means ammonia and its reaction products;
10. "Sulphur" means all sulphur
compounds, expressed as sulphur dioxide (SO2);
11. "Volatile organic compounds",
or "VOCs", means, unless otherwise specified, all organic compounds of
an anthropogenic nature, other than methane, that are capable of producing
photochemical oxidants by reaction with nitrogen oxides in the presence
of sunlight;
12. "Critical load" means
a quantitative estimate of an exposure to one or more pollutants below
which significant harmful effects on specified sensitive elements of the
environment do not occur, according to present knowledge;
13. "Critical levels" means
concentrations of pollutants in the atmosphere above which direct adverse
effects on receptors, such as human beings, plants, ecosystems or materials,
may occur, according to present knowledge;
14. "Pollutant emissions management
area", or "PEMA", means an area designated in annex III under the conditions
laid down in article 3, paragraph 9;
15. "Stationary source"
means any fixed building, structure, facility, installation or equipment
that emits or may emit sulphur, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds
or ammonia directly or indirectly into the atmosphere;
16. "New stationary
source" means any stationary source of which the construction or substantial
modification is commenced after the expiry of one year from the date of
entry into force of the present Protocol. It shall be a matter for the
competent national authorities to decide whether a modification is substantial
or not, taking into account such factors as the environmental benefits
of the modification.
Article 2
OBJECTIVE
The
objective of the present Protocol is to control and reduce emissions of
sulphur, nitrogen oxides, ammonia and volatile organic compounds that are
caused by anthropogenic activities and are likely to cause adverse effects
on human health, natural ecosystems, materials and crops, due to acidification,
eutrophication or ground-level ozone as a result of long-range transboundary
atmospheric transport, and to ensure, as far as possible, that in the long
term and in a stepwise approach, taking into account advances in scientific
knowledge, atmospheric depositions or concentrations do not exceed:
(a)
For Parties within the geographical scope of EMEP and Canada, the critical
loads of acidity, as described in annex I;
(b)
For Parties within the geographical scope of EMEP, the critical loads of
nutrient nitrogen, as described in annex I; and
(c)
For ozone:
(i) For Parties within the geographical scope of
EMEP, the critical levels of ozone, as given in annex I;
(ii) For Canada, the Canada-wide Standard for ozone;
and
(iii) For the United States of America, the National
Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone.
Article 3
BASIC OBLIGATIONS
1. Each Party having
an emission ceiling in any table in annex II shall reduce and maintain
the reduction in its annual emissions in accordance with that ceiling and
the timescales specified in that annex. Each Party shall, as a minimum,
control its annual emissions of polluting compounds in accordance with
the obligations in annex II.
2. Each Party shall
apply the limit values specified in annexes IV, V and VI to each new stationary
source within a stationary source category as identified in those annexes,
no later than the timescales specified in annex VII. As an alternative,
a Party may apply different emission reduction strategies that achieve
equivalent overall emission levels for all source categories together.
3. Each Party shall,
in so far as it is technically and economically feasible and taking into
consideration the costs and advantages, apply the limit values specified
in annexes IV, V and VI to each existing stationary source within a stationary
source category as identified in those annexes, no later than the timescales
specified in annex VII. As an alternative, a Party may apply different
emission reduction strategies that achieve equivalent overall emission
levels for all source categories together or, for Parties outside the geographical
scope of EMEP, that are necessary to achieve national or regional goals
for acidification abatement and to meet national air quality standards.
4. Limit values for
new and existing boilers and process heaters with a rated thermal input
exceeding 50 MWth and new heavy-duty vehicles shall be evaluated
by the Parties at a session of the Executive Body with a view to amending
annexes IV, V and VIII no later than two years after the date of entry
into force of the present Protocol.
5. Each Party shall
apply the limit values for the fuels and new mobile sources identified
in annex VIII, no later than the timescales specified in annex VII.
6. Each Party should
apply best available techniques to mobile sources and to each new or existing
stationary source, taking into account guidance documents I to V adopted
by the Executive Body at its seventeenth session (decision 1999/1) and
any amendments thereto.
7. Each Party shall
take appropriate measures based, inter alia, on scientific and economic
criteria to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds associated with
the use of products not included in annex VI or VIII. The Parties shall,
no later than at the second session of the Executive Body after the entry
into force of the present Protocol, consider with a view to adopting an
annex on products, including criteria for the selection of such products,
limit values for the volatile organic compound content of products not
included in annex VI or VIII, as well as timescales for the application
of the limit values.
8. Each Party shall,
subject to paragraph 10:
(a)
Apply, as a minimum, the ammonia control measures specified in annex IX;
and
(b)
Apply, where it considers it appropriate, best available techniques for
preventing and reducing ammonia emissions, as listed in guidance document
V adopted by the Executive Body at its seventeenth session (decision 1999/1)
and any amendments thereto.
9. Paragraph 10 shall
apply to any Party:
(a)
Whose total land area is greater than 2 million square kilometres;
(b)
Whose annual emissions of sulphur, nitrogen oxides, ammonia and/or volatile
organic compounds contributing to acidification, eutrophication or ozone
formation in areas under the jurisdiction of one or more other Parties
originate predominantly from within an area under its jurisdiction that
is listed as a PEMA in annex III, and which has presented documentation
in accordance with subparagraph (c) to this effect;
(c)
Which has submitted upon signature, ratification, acceptance or approval
of, or accession to, the present Protocol a description of the geographical
scope of one or more PEMAs for one or more pollutants, with supporting
documentation, for inclusion in annex III; and
(d)
Which has specified upon signature, ratification, acceptance or approval
of, or accession to, the present Protocol its intention to act in accordance
with this paragraph.
10. A Party to which
this paragraph applies shall:
(a)
If within the geographical scope of EMEP, be required to comply with the
provisions of this article and annex II only within the relevant PEMA for
each pollutant for which a PEMA within its jurisdiction is included in
annex III; or
(b)
If not within the geographical scope of EMEP, be required to comply with
the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 and annex II, only within
the relevant PEMA for each pollutant (nitrogen oxides, sulphur and/or volatile
organic compounds) for which a PEMA within its jurisdiction is included
in annex III, and shall not be required to comply with paragraph 8 anywhere
within its jurisdiction.
11. Canada and the United
States of America shall, upon their ratification, acceptance or approval
of, or accession to, the present Protocol, submit to the Executive Body
their respective emission reduction commitments with respect to sulphur,
nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds for automatic incorporation
into annex II.
12. The Parties shall,
subject to the outcome of the first review provided for under article 10,
paragraph 2, and no later than one year after completion of that review,
commence negotiations on further obligations to reduce emissions.
Article 4
EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY
1. Each Party shall,
in a manner consistent with its laws, regulations and practices and in
accordance with its obligations in the present Protocol, create favourable
conditions to facilitate the exchange of information, technologies and
techniques, with the aim of reducing emissions of sulphur, nitrogen oxides,
ammonia and volatile organic compounds by promoting inter alia:
(a)
The development and updating of databases on best available techniques,
including those that increase energy efficiency, low-emission burners and
good environmental practice in agriculture;
(b)
The exchange of information and experience in the development of less polluting
transport systems;
(c)
Direct industrial contacts and cooperation, including joint ventures; and
(d)
The provision of technical assistance.
2. In promoting the
activities specified in paragraph 1, each Party shall create favourable
conditions for the facilitation of contacts and cooperation among appropriate
organizations and individuals in the private and public sectors that are
capable of providing technology, design and engineering services, equipment
or finance.
Article 5
PUBLIC AWARENESS
1. Each Party shall,
in a manner consistent with its laws, regulations and practices, promote
the provision of information to the general public, including information
on:
(a)
National annual emissions of sulphur, nitrogen oxides, ammonia and volatile
organic compounds and progress towards compliance with the national emission
ceilings or other obligations referred to in article 3;
(b)
Depositions and concentrations of the relevant pollutants and, where applicable,
these depositions and concentrations in relation to critical loads and
levels referred to in article 2;
(c)
Levels of tropospheric ozone; and
(d)
Strategies and measures applied or to be applied to reduce air pollution
problems dealt with in the present Protocol and set out in article 6.
2. Furthermore, each
Party may make information widely available to the public with a view to
minimizing emissions, including information on:
(a)
Less polluting fuels, renewable energy and energy efficiency, including
their use in transport;
(b)
Volatile organic compounds in products, including labelling;
(c)
Management options for wastes containing volatile organic compounds that
are generated by the public;
(d)
Good agricultural practices to reduce emissions of ammonia;
(e)
Health and environmental effects associated with the pollutants covered
by the present Protocol; and
(f)
Steps which individuals and industries may take to help reduce emissions
of the pollutants covered by the present Protocol.
Article 6
STRATEGIES, POLICIES, PROGRAMMES, MEASURES AND INFORMATION
1. Each Party shall,
as necessary and on the basis of sound scientific and economic criteria,
in order to facilitate the implementation of its obligations under article
3:
(a)
Adopt supporting strategies, policies and programmes without undue delay
after the present Protocol enters into force for it;
(b)
Apply measures to control and reduce its emissions of sulphur, nitrogen
oxides, ammonia and volatile organic compounds;
(c)
Apply measures to encourage the increase of energy efficiency and the use
of renewable energy;
(d)
Apply measures to decrease the use of polluting fuels;
(e)
Develop and introduce less polluting transport systems and promote traffic
management systems to reduce overall emissions from road traffic;
(f)
Apply measures to encourage the development and introduction of low-polluting
processes and products, taking into account guidance documents I to V adopted
by the Executive Body at its seventeenth session (decision 1999/1) and
any amendments thereto;
(g)
Encourage the implementation of management programmes to reduce emissions,
including voluntary programmes, and the use of economic instruments, taking
into account guidance document VI adopted by the Executive Body at its
seventeenth session (decision 1999/1) and any amendments thereto;
(h)
Implement and further elaborate policies and measures in accordance with
its national circumstances, such as the progressive reduction or phasing-out
of market imperfections, fiscal incentives, tax and duty exemptions and
subsidies in all sectors that emit sulphur, nitrogen oxides, ammonia and
volatile organic compounds which run counter to the objective of the Protocol,
and apply market instruments; and
(i)
Apply measures, where cost-effective, to reduce emissions from waste products
containing volatile organic compounds.
2. Each Party shall
collect and maintain information on:
(a)
Actual levels of emissions of sulphur, nitrogen compounds and volatile
organic compounds, and of ambient concentrations and depositions of these
compounds and ozone, taking into account, for those Parties within the
geographical scope of EMEP, the work plan of EMEP; and
(b)
The effects of ambient concentrations and of the deposition of sulphur,
nitrogen compounds, volatile organic compounds and ozone on human health,
terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and materials.
3. Any Party may take
more stringent measures than those required by the present Protocol.
Article 7
REPORTING
1. Subject to its laws
and regulations and in accordance with its obligations under the present
Protocol:
(a)
Each Party shall report, through the Executive Secretary of the Commission,
to the Executive Body, on a periodic basis as determined by the Parties
at a session of the Executive Body, information on the measures that it
has taken to implement the present Protocol. Moreover:
(i) Where a Party applies different emission reduction strategies under article 3, paragraphs 2 and 3, it shall document the strategies applied and its compliance with the requirements of those paragraphs;
(ii) Where a Party judges certain limit values,
as specified in accordance with article 3, paragraph 3, not to be technically
and economically feasible, taking into consideration the costs and advantages,
it shall report and justify this;
(b)
Each Party within the geographical scope of EMEP shall report, through
the Executive Secretary of the Commission, to EMEP, on a periodic basis
to be determined by the Steering Body of EMEP and approved by the Parties
at a session of the Executive Body, the following information:
(i) Levels of emissions of sulphur, nitrogen oxides,
ammonia and volatile organic compounds using, as a minimum, the methodologies
and the temporal and spatial resolution specified by the Steering Body
of EMEP;
(ii) Levels of emissions of each substance in the
reference year (1990) using the same methodologies and temporal and spatial
resolution;
(iii) Data on projected emissions and current reduction
plans; and
(iv) Where it deems it appropriate, any exceptional
circumstances justifying emissions that are temporarily higher than the
ceilings established for it for one or more pollutants; and
(c)
Parties in areas outside the geographical scope of EMEP shall make available
information similar to that specified in subparagraph (b), if requested
to do so by the Executive Body.
2. The information to
be reported in accordance with paragraph 1 (a) shall be in conformity with
a decision regarding format and content to be adopted by the Parties at
a session of the Executive Body. The terms of this decision shall be reviewed
as necessary to identify any additional elements regarding the format or
the content of the information that is to be included in the reports.
3. In good time before
each annual session of the Executive Body, EMEP shall provide information
on:
(a)
Ambient concentrations and depositions of sulphur and nitrogen compounds
as well as, where available, ambient concentrations of volatile organic
compounds and ozone; and
(b)
Calculations of sulphur and oxidized and reduced nitrogen budgets and relevant
information on the long-range transport of ozone and its precursors.
Parties
in areas outside the geographical scope of EMEP shall make available similar
information if requested to do so by the Executive Body.
4. The Executive Body
shall, in accordance with article 10, paragraph 2 (b), of the Convention,
arrange for the preparation of information on the effects of depositions
of sulphur and nitrogen compounds and concentrations of ozone.
5. The Parties shall,
at sessions of the Executive Body, arrange for the preparation, at regular
intervals, of revised information on calculated and internationally optimized
allocations of emission reductions for the States within the geographical
scope of EMEP, using integrated assessment models, including atmospheric
transport models, with a view to reducing further, for the purposes of
article 3, paragraph 1, the difference between actual depositions of sulphur
and nitrogen compounds and critical load values as well as the difference
between actual ozone concentrations and the critical levels of ozone specified
in annex I, or such alternative assessment methods as approved by the Parties
at a session of the Executive Body.
Article 8
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND MONITORING
The
Parties shall encourage research, development, monitoring and cooperation
related to:
(a)
The international harmonization of methods for the calculation and assessment
of the adverse effects associated with the substances addressed by the
present Protocol for use in establishing critical loads and critical levels
and, as appropriate, the elaboration of procedures for such harmonization;
(b)
The improvement of emission databases, in particular those on ammonia and
volatile organic compounds;
(c)
The improvement of monitoring techniques and systems and of the modelling
of transport, concentrations and depositions of sulphur, nitrogen compounds
and volatile organic compounds, as well as of the formation of ozone and
secondary particulate matter;
(d)
The improvement of the scientific understanding of the long-term fate of
emissions and their impact on the hemispheric background concentrations
of sulphur, nitrogen, volatile organic compounds, ozone and particulate
matter, focusing, in particular, on the chemistry of the free troposphere
and the potential for intercontinental flow of pollutants;
(e)
The further elaboration of an overall strategy to reduce the adverse effects
of acidification, eutrophication and photochemical pollution, including
synergisms and combined effects;
(f)
Strategies for the further reduction of emissions of sulphur, nitrogen
oxides, ammonia and volatile organic compounds based on critical loads
and critical levels as well as on technical developments, and the improvement
of integrated assessment modelling to calculate internationally optimized
allocations of emission reductions taking into account the need to avoid
excessive costs for any Party. Special emphasis should be given to emissions
from agriculture and transport;
(g)
The identification of trends over time and the scientific understanding
of the wider effects of sulphur, nitrogen and volatile organic compounds
and photochemical pollution on human health, including their contribution
to concentrations of particulate matter, the environment, in particular
acidification and eutrophication, and materials, especially historic and
cultural monuments, taking into account the relationship between sulphur
oxides, nitrogen oxides, ammonia, volatile organic compounds and tropospheric
ozone;
(h)
Emission abatement technologies, and technologies and techniques to improve
energy efficiency, energy conservation and the use of renewable energy;
(i)
The efficacy of ammonia control techniques for farms and their impact on
local and regional deposition;
(j)
The management of transport demand and the development and promotion of
less polluting modes of transport;
(k)
The quantification and, where possible, economic evaluation of benefits
for the environment and human health resulting from the reduction of emissions
of sulphur, nitrogen oxides, ammonia and volatile organic compounds; and
(l)
The development of tools for making the methods and results of this work
widely applicable and available.
Article 9
COMPLIANCE
Compliance
by each Party with its obligations under the present Protocol shall be
reviewed regularly. The Implementation Committee established by decision
1997/2 of the Executive Body at its fifteenth session shall carry out such
reviews and report to the Parties at a session of the Executive Body in
accordance with the terms of the annex to that decision, including any
amendments thereto.
Article 10
REVIEWS BY THE PARTIES AT SESSIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE BODY
1. The Parties shall,
at sessions of the Executive Body, pursuant to article 10, paragraph 2
(a), of the Convention, review the information supplied by the Parties,
EMEP and subsidiary bodies of the Executive Body, the data on the effects
of concentrations and depositions of sulphur and nitrogen compounds and
of photochemical pollution as well as the reports of the Implementation
Committee referred to in article 9 above.
2. (a)
The Parties shall, at sessions of the Executive Body, keep under review
the obligations set out in the present Protocol, including:
(i) Their obligations in relation to their calculated
and internationally optimized allocations of emission reductions referred
to in article 7, paragraph 5, above; and
(ii) The adequacy of the obligations and the progress
made towards the achievement of the objective of the present Protocol;
(b)
Reviews shall take into account the best available scientific information
on the effects of acidification, eutrophication and photochemical pollution,
including assessments of all relevant health effects, critical levels and
loads, the development and refinement of integrated assessment models,
technological developments, changing economic conditions, progress made
on the databases on emissions and abatement techniques, especially related
to ammonia and volatile organic compounds, and the fulfilment of the obligations
on emission levels;
(c)
The procedures, methods and timing for such reviews shall be specified
by the Parties at a session of the Executive Body. The first such review
shall commence no later than one year after the present Protocol enters
into force.
Article 11
SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES
1. In the event of a
dispute between any two or more Parties concerning the interpretation or
application of the present Protocol, the parties concerned shall seek a
settlement of the dispute through negotiation or any other peaceful means
of their own choice. The parties to the dispute shall inform the Executive
Body of their dispute.
2. When ratifying, accepting,
approving or acceding to the present Protocol, or at any time thereafter,
a Party which is not a regional economic integration organization may declare
in a written instrument submitted to the Depositary that, in respect of
any dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the Protocol,
it recognizes one or both of the following means of dispute settlement
as compulsory ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation
to any Party accepting the same obligation:
(a)
Submission of the dispute to the International Court of Justice;
(b)
Arbitration in accordance with procedures to be adopted by the Parties
at a session of the Executive Body, as soon as practicable, in an annex
on arbitration.
A
Party which is a regional economic integration organization may make a
declaration with like effect in relation to arbitration in accordance with
the procedures referred to in subparagraph (b).
3. A declaration made
under paragraph 2 shall remain in force until it expires in accordance
with its terms or until three months after written notice of its revocation
has been deposited with the Depositary.
4. A new declaration,
a notice of revocation or the expiry of a declaration shall not in any
way affect proceedings pending before the International Court of Justice
or the arbitral tribunal, unless the parties to the dispute agree otherwise.
5. Except in a case
where the parties to a dispute have accepted the same means of dispute
settlement under paragraph 2, if after twelve months following notification
by one party to another that a dispute exists between them, the parties
concerned have not been able to settle their dispute through the means
mentioned in paragraph 1, the dispute shall be submitted, at the request
of any of the parties to the dispute, to conciliation.
6. For the purpose of
paragraph 5, a conciliation commission shall be created. The commission
shall be composed of an equal number of members appointed by each party
concerned or, where parties in conciliation share the same interest, by
the group sharing that interest, and a chairperson chosen jointly by the
members so appointed. The commission shall render a recommendatory award,
which the parties to the dispute shall consider in good faith.
Article 12
ANNEXES
The
annexes to the present Protocol shall form an integral part of the Protocol.
Article 13
AMENDMENTS AND ADJUSTMENTS
1. Any Party may propose
amendments to the present Protocol. Any Party to the Convention may propose
an adjustment to annex II to the present Protocol to add to it its name,
together with emission levels, emission ceilings and percentage emission
reductions.
2. Proposed amendments
and adjustments shall be submitted in writing to the Executive Secretary
of the Commission, who shall communicate them to all Parties. The Parties
shall discuss the proposed amendments and adjustments at the next session
of the Executive Body, provided that those proposals have been circulated
by the Executive Secretary to the Parties at least ninety days in advance.
3. Amendments to the
present Protocol, including amendments to annexes II to IX, shall be adopted
by consensus of the Parties present at a session of the Executive Body,
and shall enter into force for the Parties which have accepted them on
the ninetieth day after the date on which two thirds of the Parties have
deposited with the Depositary their instruments of acceptance thereof.
Amendments shall enter into force for any other Party on the ninetieth
day after the date on which that Party has deposited its instrument of
acceptance thereof.
4. Amendments to the
annexes to the present Protocol, other than to the annexes referred to
in paragraph 3, shall be adopted by consensus of the Parties present at
a session of the Executive Body. On the expiry of ninety days from the
date of its communication to all Parties by the Executive Secretary of
the Commission, an amendment to any such annex shall become effective for
those Parties which have not submitted to the Depositary a notification
in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5, provided that at least
sixteen Parties have not submitted such a notification.
5. Any Party that is
unable to approve an amendment to an annex, other than to an annex referred
to in paragraph 3, shall so notify the Depositary in writing within ninety
days from the date of the communication of its adoption. The Depositary
shall without delay notify all Parties of any such notification received.
A Party may at any time substitute an acceptance for its previous notification
and, upon deposit of an instrument of acceptance with the Depositary, the
amendment to such an annex shall become effective for that Party.
6. Adjustments to annex
II shall be adopted by consensus of the Parties present at a session of
the Executive Body and shall become effective for all Parties to the present
Protocol on the ninetieth day following the date on which the Executive
Secretary of the Commission notifies those Parties in writing of the adoption
of the adjustment.
Article 14
SIGNATURE
1. The present Protocol
shall be open for signature at Gothenburg (Sweden) on 30 November and 1
December 1999, then at United Nations Headquarters in New York until 30
May 2000, by States members of the Commission as well as States having
consultative status with the Commission, pursuant to paragraph 8 of Economic
and Social Council resolution 36 (IV) of 28 March 1947, and by regional
economic integration organizations, constituted by sovereign States members
of the Commission, which have competence in respect of the negotiation,
conclusion and application of international agreements in matters covered
by the Protocol, provided that the States and organizations concerned are
Parties to the Convention and are listed in annex II.
2. In matters within
their competence, such regional economic integration organizations shall,
on their own behalf, exercise the rights and fulfil the responsibilities
which the present Protocol attributes to their member States. In such cases,
the member States of these organizations shall not be entitled to exercise
such rights individually.
Article 15
RATIFICATION, ACCEPTANCE, APPROVAL AND ACCESSION
1. The present Protocol
shall be subject to ratification, acceptance or approval by Signatories.
2. The present Protocol
shall be open for accession as from 31 May 2000 by the States and organizations
that meet the requirements of article 14, paragraph 1.
3. The instruments of
ratification, acceptance, approval or accession shall be deposited with
the Depositary.
Article 16
DEPOSITARY
The
Secretary-General of the United Nations shall be the Depositary.
Article 17
ENTRY INTO FORCE
1. The present Protocol
shall enter into force on the ninetieth day following the date on which
the sixteenth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession
has been deposited with the Depositary.
2. For each State and
organization that meets the requirements of article 14, paragraph 1, which
ratifies, accepts or approves the present Protocol or accedes thereto after
the deposit of the sixteenth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval
or accession, the Protocol shall enter into force on the ninetieth day
following the date of deposit by such Party of its instrument of ratification,
acceptance, approval or accession.
Article 18
WITHDRAWAL
At any time after five years
from the date on which the present Protocol has come into force with respect
to a Party, that Party may withdraw from it by giving written notification
to the Depositary. Any such withdrawal shall take effect on the ninetieth
day following the date of its receipt by the Depositary, or on such later
date as may be specified in the notification of the withdrawal.
Article 19
AUTHENTIC TEXTS
The
original of the present Protocol, of which the English, French and Russian
texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the Secretary-General
of the United Nations.
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed
the present Protocol.
DONE at Gothenburg (Sweden), this thirtieth day of November one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine.
Annex I
CRITICAL LOADS AND LEVELS
I. CRITICAL LOADS OF ACIDITY
A. For Parties within the geographical scope of EMEP
1. Critical loads (as
defined in article 1) of acidity for ecosystems are determined in accordance
with the Convention's Manual on methodologies and criteria for mapping
critical levels/loads and geographical areas where they are exceeded.
They are the maximum amount of acidifying deposition an ecosystem can tolerate
in the long term without being damaged. Critical loads of acidity in terms
of nitrogen take account of within-ecosystem nitrogen removal processes
(e.g. uptake by plants). Critical loads of acidity in terms of sulphur
do not. A combined sulphur and nitrogen critical load of acidity considers
nitrogen only when the nitrogen deposition is greater than the ecosystem
nitrogen removal processes. All critical loads reported by Parties are
summarized for use in the integrated assessment modelling employed to provide
guidance for setting the emission ceilings in annex II.
B. For Parties in North America
2. For eastern Canada,
critical sulphur plus nitrogen loads for forested ecosystems have been
determined with scientific methodologies and criteria (1997 Canadian Acid
Rain Assessment) similar to those in the Convention's
Manual on methodologies
and criteria for mapping critical levels/loads and geographical areas where
they are exceeded. Eastern Canada critical load values (as defined
in article 1) of acidity are for sulphate in precipitation expressed in
kg/ha/year. Alberta in western Canada, where deposition levels are currently
below the environmental limits, has adopted the generic critical load classification
systems used for soils in Europe for potential acidity. Potential acidity
is defined by subtracting the total (both wet and dry) deposition of base
cations from that of sulphur and nitrogen. In addition to critical loads
for potential acidity, Alberta has established target and monitoring loads
for managing acidifying emissions.
3. For the United States
of America, the effects of acidification are evaluated through an assessment
of the sensitivity of ecosystems, the total loading within ecosystems of
acidifying compounds, and the uncertainty associated with nitrogen removal
processes within ecosystems.
4. These loads and effects
are used in integrated assessment modelling and provide guidance for setting
the emission ceilings and/or reductions for Canada and the United States
of America in annex II.
II. CRITICAL LOADS OF NUTRIENT NITROGEN
For Parties within the geographical scope of EMEP
5. Critical loads (as
defined in article 1) of nutrient nitrogen (eutrophication) for ecosystems
are determined in accordance with the Convention's Manual on methodologies
and criteria for mapping critical levels/loads and geographical areas where
they are exceeded. They are the maximum amount of eutrophying nitrogen
deposition an ecosystem can tolerate in the long term without being damaged.
All critical loads reported by Parties are summarized for use in the integrated
assessment modelling employed to provide guidance for setting the emission
ceilings in annex II.
III. CRITICAL LEVELS OF OZONE
A. For Parties within the geographical scope of EMEP
6. Critical levels (as
defined in article 1) of ozone are determined to protect plants in accordance
with the Convention's Manual on methodologies and criteria for mapping
critical levels/loads and geographical areas where they are exceeded.
They are expressed as a cumulative exposure over a threshold ozone concentration
of 40 ppb (parts per billion by volume). This exposure index is referred
to as AOT40 (accumulated exposure over a threshold of 40 ppb). The AOT40
is calculated as the sum of the differences between the hourly concentration
(in ppb) and 40 ppb for each hour when the concentration exceeds 40 ppb.
7. The long-term critical
level of ozone for crops of an AOT40 of 3000 ppb.hours for May-July (used
as a typical growing season) and for daylight hours was used to define
areas at risk where the critical level is exceeded. A specific reduction
of exceedances was targeted in the integrated assessment modelling undertaken
for the present Protocol to provide guidance for setting the emission ceilings
in annex II. The long-term critical level of ozone for crops is considered
also to protect other plants such as trees and natural vegetation. Further
scientific work is under way to develop a more differentiated interpretation
of exceedances of critical levels of ozone for vegetation.
8. A critical level
of ozone for human health is represented by the WHO Air Quality Guideline
level for ozone of 120 µg/m3 as an 8-hour average. In
collaboration with the World Health Organization's Regional Office for
Europe (WHO/EURO), a critical level expressed as an AOT60 (accumulated
exposure over a threshold of 60 ppb), i.e. 120 µg/m3,
calculated over one year, was adopted as a surrogate for the WHO Air Quality
Guideline for the purpose of integrated assessment modelling. This was
used to define areas at risk where the critical level is exceeded. A specific
reduction of these exceedances was targeted in the integrated assessment
modelling undertaken for the present Protocol to provide guidance for setting
the emission ceilings in annex II.
B. For Parties in North America
9. For Canada, critical
levels of ozone are determined to protect human health and the environment
and are used to establish a Canada-wide Standard for ozone. The emission
ceilings in annex II are defined according to the ambition level required
to achieve the Canada-wide Standard for ozone.
10. For the United States of America, critical levels of ozone are determined to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety, to protect public welfare from any known or expected adverse effects, and are used to establish a national ambient air quality standard. Integrated assessment modelling and the air quality standard are used in providing guidance for setting the emission ceilings and/or reductions for the United States of America in annex II.
Annex II
EMISSION CEILINGS
The
emission ceilings listed in the tables below relate to the provisions of
article 3, paragraphs 1 and 10, of the present Protocol. The 1980 and 1990
emission levels and the percentage emission reductions listed are given
for information purposes only.
Table 1. Emission ceilings for sulphur (thousands of tonnes of SO2 per year)
| Emission levels | Emission ceilings for 2010 | Percentage emission reductions for 2010 (base year 1990) | ||
| Party | 1980 | 1990 | ||
| Armenia | 141 | 73 | 73 | 0% |
| Austria | 400 | 91 | 39 | -57% |
| Belarus | 740 | 637 | 480 | -25% |
| Belgium | 828 | 372 | 106 | -72% |
| Bulgaria | 2050 | 2008 | 856 | -57% |
| Canada national a/ | 4643 | 3236 | ||
| PEMA (SOMA) | 3135 | 1873 | ||
| Croatia | 150 | 180 | 70 | -61% |
| Czech Republic | 2257 | 1876 | 283 | -85% |
| Denmark | 450 | 182 | 55 | -70% |
| Finland | 584 | 260 | 116 | -55% |
| France | 3208 | 1269 | 400 | -68% |
| Germany | 7514 | 5313 | 550 | -90% |
| Greece | 400 | 509 | 546 | 7% |
| Hungary | 1633 | 1010 | 550 | -46% |
| Ireland | 222 | 178 | 42 | -76% |
| Italy | 3757 | 1651 | 500 | -70% |
| Latvia | - | 119 | 107 | -10% |
| Liechtenstein | 0.39 | 0.15 | 0.11 | -27% |
| Lithuania | 311 | 222 | 145 | -35% |
| Luxembourg | 24 | 15 | 4 | -73% |
| Netherlands | 490 | 202 | 50 | -75% |
| Norway | 137 | 53 | 22 | -58% |
| Poland | 4100 | 3210 | 1397 | -56% |
| Portugal | 266 | 362 | 170 | -53% |
| Republic of Moldova | 308 | 265 | 135 | -49% |
| Romania | 1055 | 1311 | 918 | -30% |
| Russian Federation b/ | 7161 | 4460 | ||
| PEMA | 1062 | 1133 | 635 | -44% |
| Slovakia | 780 | 543 | 110 | -80% |
| Slovenia | 235 | 194 | 27 | -86% |
| Spain b/ | 2959 | 2182 | 774 | -65% |
| Sweden | 491 | 119 | 67 | -44% |
| Switzerland | 116 | 43 | 26 | -40% |
| Ukraine | 3849 | 2782 | 1457 | -48% |
| United Kingdom | 4863 | 3731 | 625 | -83% |
| United States of America c/ | ||||
| European Community | 26456 | 16436 | 4059 | -75% |
a/ Upon ratification, acceptance or approval of, or accession
to, the present Protocol, Canada shall submit an emission ceiling for sulphur,
either at a national level or for its PEMA, and will endeavour to provide
a ceiling for 2010. The PEMA for sulphur will be the sulphur oxides management
area (SOMA) that was designated pursuant to annex III to the Protocol on
Further Reduction of Sulphur Emissions adopted at Oslo on 14 June 1994
as the South-east Canada SOMA. This is an area of 1 million km2
which includes all the territory of the provinces of Prince Edward Island,
Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, all the territory of the province of Quebec
south of a straight line between Havre-St. Pierre on the north coast of
the Gulf of Saint Lawrence and the point where the Quebec-Ontario boundary
intersects the James Bay coastline, and all the territory of the province
of Ontario south of a straight line between the point where the Ontario-Quebec
boundary intersects the James Bay coastline and Nipigon River near the
north shore of Lake Superior.
b/ Figures apply to the European part within the EMEP area.
c/ Upon ratification, acceptance or approval of, or accession
to, the present Protocol, the United States of America shall provide for
inclusion in this annex: (a) specific emission reduction measures applicable
to mobile and stationary sources of sulphur to be applied either nationally
or within a PEMA if it has submitted a PEMA for sulphur for inclusion in
annex III; (b) a value for total estimated sulphur emission levels for
1990, either national or for the PEMA; (c) an indicative value for total
sulphur emission levels for 2010, either national or for the PEMA; and
(d) associated estimates of the percentage reduction in sulphur emissions.
Item (b) will be included in the table and items (a), (c) and (d) will
be included in a footnote to the table.
Table 2. Emission ceilings for nitrogen oxides (thousands of tonnes of NO2 per year)
| Emission levels
1990 |
Emission ceilings for 2010 | Percentage emission reductions for 2010 (base year 1990) | |
| Party | |||
| Armenia | 46 | 46 | 0% |
| Austria | 194 | 107 | -45% |
| Belarus | 285 | 255 | -11% |
| Belgium | 339 | 181 | -47% |
| Bulgaria | 361 | 266 | -26% |
| Canada a/ | 2104 | ||
| Croatia | 87 | 87 | 0% |
| Czech Republic | 742 | 286 | -61% |
| Denmark | 282 | 127 | -55% |
| Finland | 300 | 170 | -43% |
| France | 1882 | 860 | -54% |
| Germany | 2693 | 1081 | -60% |
| Greece | 343 | 344 | 0% |
| Hungary | 238 | 198 | -17% |
| Ireland | 115 | 65 | -43% |
| Italy | 1938 | 1000 | -48% |
| Latvia | 93 | 84 | -10% |
| Liechtenstein | 0.63 | 0.37 | -41% |
| Lithuania | 158 | 110 | -30% |
| Luxembourg | 23 | 11 | -52% |
| Netherlands | 580 | 266 | -54% |
| Norway | 218 | 156 | -28% |
| Poland | 1280 | 879 | -31% |
| Portugal | 348 | 260 | -25% |
| Republic of Moldova | 100 | 90 | -10% |
| Romania | 546 | 437 | -20% |
| Russian Federation b/ | 3600 | ||
| PEMA | 360 | 265 | -26% |
| Slovakia | 225 | 130 | -42% |
| Slovenia | 62 | 45 | -27% |
| Spain b/ | 1113 | 847 | -24% |
| Sweden | 338 | 148 | -56% |
| Switzerland | 166 | 79 | -52% |
| Ukraine | 1888 | 1222 | -35% |
| United Kingdom | 2673 | 1181 | -56% |
| United States of America c/ | |||
| European Community | 13161 | 6671 | -49% |
a/ Upon ratification, acceptance or approval of, or accession
to, the present Protocol, Canada shall submit 1990 emission levels and
2010 emission ceilings for nitrogen oxides, either at a national level
or for its PEMA for nitrogen oxides, if it has submitted one.
b/ Figures apply to the European part within the EMEP area.
c/ Upon ratification, acceptance or approval of, or accession to, the present Protocol, the United States of America shall provide for inclusion in this annex: (a) specific emission reduction measures applicable to mobile and stationary sources of nitrogen oxides to be applied either nationally or within a PEMA if it has submitted a PEMA for nitrogen oxides for inclusion in annex III; (b) a value for total estimated nitrogen oxide emission levels for 1990, either national or for the PEMA; (c) an indicative value for total nitrogen oxide emission levels for 2010, either national or for the PEMA; and (d) associated estimates of the percentage reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions. Item (b) will be included in the table and items (a), (c) and (d) will be included in a footnote to the table.
Table 3. Emission ceilings for ammonia (thousands of tonnes of NH3 per year)
| Emission levels
1990 |
Emission ceilings for 2010 | Percentage emission reductions for 2010 (base year 1990) | |
| Party | |||
| Armenia | 25 | 25 | 0% |
| Austria | 81 | 66 | -19% |
| Belarus | 219 | 158 | -28% |
| Belgium | 107 | 74 | -31% |
| Bulgaria | 144 | 108 | -25% |
| Croatia | 37 | 30 | -19% |
| Czech Republic | 156 | 101 | -35% |
| Denmark | 122 | 69 | -43% |
| Finland | 35 | 31 | -11% |
| France | 814 | 780 | -4% |
| Germany | 764 | 550 | -28% |
| Greece | 80 | 73 | -9% |
| Hungary | 124 | 90 | -27% |
| Ireland | 126 | 116 | -8% |
| Italy | 466 | 419 | -10% |
| Latvia | 44 | 44 | 0% |
| Liechtenstein | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0% |
| Lithuania | 84 | 84 | 0% |
| Luxembourg | 7 | 7 | 0% |
| Netherlands | 226 | 128 | -43% |
| Norway | 23 | 23 | 0% |
| Poland | 508 | 468 | -8% |
| Portugal | 98 | 108 | 10% |
| Republic of Moldova | 49 | 42 | -14% |
| Romania | 300 | 210 | -30% |
| Russian Federation a/ | 1191 | ||
| PEMA | 61 | 49 | -20% |
| Slovakia | 62 | 39 | -37% |
| Slovenia | 24 | 20 | -17% |
| Spain a/ | 351 | 353 | 1% |
| Sweden | 61 | 57 | -7% |
| Switzerland | 72 | 63 | -13% |
| Ukraine | 729 | 592 | -19% |
| United Kingdom | 333 | 297 | -11% |
| European Community | 3671 | 3129 | -15% |
a/ Figures apply to the European part within the EMEP area.
Table 4. Emission ceilings for volatile organic compounds (thousands of tonnes of VOC per year)
| Emission levels
1990 |
Emission ceilings for 2010 | Percentage emission reductions for 2010 (base year 1990) | |
| Party | |||
| Armenia | 81 | 81 | 0% |
| Austria | 351 | 159 | -55% |
| Belarus | 533 | 309 | -42% |
| Belgium | 324 | 144 | -56% |
| Bulgaria | 217 | 185 | -15% |
| Canada a/ | 2880 | ||
| Croatia | 105 | 90 | -14% |
| Czech Republic | 435 | 220 | -49% |
| Denmark | 178 | 85 | -52% |
| Finland | 209 | 130 | -38% |
| France | 2957 | 1100 | -63% |
| Germany | 3195 | 995 | -69% |
| Greece | 373 | 261 | -30% |
| Hungary | 205 | 137 | -33% |
| Ireland | 197 | 55 | -72% |
| Italy | 2213 | 1159 | -48% |
| Latvia | 152 | 136 | -11% |
| Liechtenstein | 1.56 | 0.86 | -45% |
| Lithuania | 103 | 92 | -11% |
| Luxembourg | 20 | 9 | -55% |
| Netherlands | 502 | 191 | -62% |
| Norway | 310 | 195 | -37% |
| Poland | 831 | 800 | -4% |
| Portugal | 640 | 202 | -68% |
| Republic of Moldova | 157 | 100 | -36% |
| Romania | 616 | 523 | -15% |
| Russian Federation b/ | 3566 | ||
| PEMA | 203 | 165 | -19% |
| Slovakia | 149 | 140 | -6% |
| Slovenia | 42 | 40 | -5% |
| Spain b/ | 1094 | 669 | -39% |
| Sweden | 526 | 241 | -54% |
| Switzerland | 292 | 144 | -51% |
| Ukraine | 1369 | 797 | -42% |
| United Kingdom | 2555 | 1200 | -53% |
| United States of America c/ | |||
| European Community | 15353 | 6600 | -57% |
a/ Upon ratification, acceptance or approval of, or accession
to, the present Protocol, Canada shall submit 1990 emission levels and
2010 emission ceilings for volatile organic compounds, either at a national
level or for its PEMA for volatile organic compounds, if it has submitted
one.
b/ Figures apply to the European part within the EMEP area.
c/ Upon ratification, acceptance or approval of, or accession to, the present Protocol, the United States of America shall provide for inclusion in this annex: (a) specific emission reduction measures applicable to mobile and stationary sources of volatile organic compounds to be applied either nationally or within a PEMA if it has submitted a PEMA for volatile organic compounds for inclusion in annex III; (b) a value for total estimated volatile organic compound emission levels for 1990, either national or for the PEMA; (c) an indicative value for total volatile organic compound emission levels for 2010, either national or for the PEMA; and (d) associated estimates of the percentage reduction in volatile organic compound emissions. Item (b) will be included in the table and items (a), (c) and (d) will be included in a footnote to the table.
Annex III
DESIGNATED POLLUTANT EMISSIONS MANAGEMENT AREA (PEMA)
The
following PEMA is listed for the purpose of the present Protocol:
Russian
Federation PEMA
This is the area of Murmansk oblast, the Republic of Karelia, Leningrad oblast (including St. Petersburg), Pskov oblast, Novgorod oblast and Kaliningrad oblast. The boundary of the PEMA coincides with the State and administrative boundaries of these constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
Annex IV
LIMIT VALUES FOR EMISSIONS OF SULPHUR FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
Table 1. Limit values for SOx emissions released from boilers a/
| Thermal input
(MWth) |
Limit value
(mg SO2/Nm3) b/ |
Alternative for domestic solid fuels removal efficiency | |
| Solid and liquid fuels, new installations | 50 - 100 | 850 | 90% d/ |
| 100 - 300 | 850 - 200 c/
(linear decrease) |
92% d/ | |
| > 300 | 200 c/ | 95% d/ | |
| Solid fuels, existing installations | 50 - 100 | 2000 | |
| 100 - 500 | 2000 - 400 (linear decrease) | ||
| > 500 | 400 | ||
| 50 - 150 | 40% | ||
| 150 - 500 | 40 - 90%
(linear increase) |
||
| > 500 | 90% | ||
| Liquid fuels, existing installations | 50 - 300 | 1700 | |
| 300 - 500 | 1700 - 400 (linear decrease) | ||
| > 500 | 400 | ||
| Gaseous fuels in general, new and existing installations | 35 | ||
| Liquefied gas, new and existing installations | 5 | ||
| Low-calorific-value gases
(e.g. gasification of refinery residues or combustion of coke oven gas) |
new 400
existing 800 |
||
| Blast-furnace gas | new 200
existing 800 |
||
| New combustion plant in refineries (average of all new combustion installations) | > 50 (total refinery capacity) | 600 | |
| Existing combustion plant in refineries (average of all existing combustion installations) | 1000 |
a/ In particular, the limit values shall not apply to:
- Plant in which the products of combustion are used for direct heating,
drying, or any other treatment of objects or materials, e.g. reheating
furnaces, furnaces for heat treatment;
- Post-combustion plant, i.e. any technical apparatus designed to purify
the waste gases by combustion that is not operated as an independent combustion
plant;
- Facilities for the regeneration of catalytic cracking catalysts;
- Facilities for the conversion of hydrogen sulphide into sulphur;
- Reactors used in the chemical industry;
- Coke battery furnaces;
- Cowpers;
- Waste incinerators; and
- Plant powered by diesel, petrol or gas engines or by combustion turbines,
irrespective of the fuel used.
b/ The O2 reference content is 6% for solid fuels
and 3% for others.
c/ 400 with heavy fuel oil S <0.25%.
d/ If an installation reaches 300 mg/Nm3 SO2,
it may be exempted from applying the removal efficiency.
|
|
|
| Gas oil | < 0.2 after 1 July 2000
< 0.1 after 1 January 2008 |
a/ "Gas oil" means any petroleum product within HS 2710, or any
petroleum product which, by reason of its distillation limits, falls within
the category of middle distillates intended for use as fuel and of which
at least 85 per cent by volume, including distillation losses, distils
at 3500C. Fuels used in on-road and non-road vehicles and agricultural
tractors are excluded from this definition. Gas oil intended for marine
use is included in the definition if it meets the description above or
it has a viscosity or density falling within the ranges of viscosity or
density defined for marine distillates in table I of ISO 8217 (1996).
(b)
Sulphur recovery 97% for existing plant.
1/ Monitoring is to be understood as an overall activity, comprising measuring of emissions, mass balancing, etc. It can be carried out continuously or discontinuously.
Annex V
LIMIT VALUES FOR EMISSIONS OF NITROGEN OXIDES
FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
| Limit value (mg/Nm3)b/ | |
| Solid fuels, new installations: | |
| - Boilers 50 - 100 MWth | 400 |
| - Boilers 100 - 300 MWth | 300 |
| - Boilers >300 MWth | 200 |
| Solid fuels, existing installations: | |
| - Solid in general | 650 |
| - Solid with less than 10% volatile compounds | 1300 |
| Liquid fuels, new installations: | |
| - Boilers 50 - 100 MWth | 400 |
| - Boilers 100 - 300 MWth | 300 |
| - Boilers >300 MWth | 200 |
| Liquid fuels, existing installations | 450 |
| Gaseous fuels, new installations: | |
| Fuel: natural gas | |
| - Boilers 50 - 300 MWth | 150 |
| - Boilers > 300 MWth | 100 |
| Fuel: all other gases | 200 |
| Gaseous fuels, existing installations | 350 |
a/ In particular, the limit values shall not apply to:
- Plant in which the products of combustion are used for direct heating,
drying, or any other treatment of objects or materials, e.g. reheating
furnaces, furnaces for heat treatment;
- Post-combustion plant, i.e. any technical apparatus designed to purify
the waste gases by combustion that is not operated as an independent combustion
plant;
- Facilities for the regeneration of catalytic cracking catalysts;
- Facilities for the conversion of hydrogen sulphide into sulphur;
- Reactors used in the chemical industry;
- Coke battery furnaces;
- Cowpers;
- Waste incinerators; and
- Plant powered by diesel, petrol or gas engines or by combustion turbines,
irrespective of the fuel used.
b/ These values do not apply to boilers running less than 500
hours a year. The O2 reference content is 6% for solid fuels
and 3% for others.
|
|
|
| New installations, natural gas a/ | 50 b/ |
| New installations, liquid fuels c/ | 120 |
| Existing installations, all fuels d/ | |
| - Natural gas | 150 |
| - Liquid | 200 |
a/ Natural gas is naturally occurring methane with not more than
20% (by volume) of inerts and other constituents.
b/ 75 mg/Nm3 if:
- Combustion turbine used in a combined heat and power system; or
- Combustion turbine driving compressor for public gas grid supply.
For combustion turbines not falling into either of the above categories,
but having an efficiency greater than 35%, determined at ISO base load
conditions, the limit value shall be 50*n/35 where n is the combustion
turbine efficiency expressed as a percentage (and determined at ISO base
load conditions).
c/ This limit value applies only to combustion turbines firing
light and medium distillates.
d/ The limit values do not apply to combustion turbines running
less than 150 hours a year.
| Limit value (mg/Nm3) | |
| New installations (10% O2) | |
| - Dry kilns | 500 |
| - Other kilns | 800 |
| Existing installations (10% O2) | 1200 |
a/ Installations for the production of cement clinker in rotary
kilns with a capacity >500 Mg/day or in other furnaces with a capacity
>50 Mg/day.
| Capacity, technique, fuel specification | Limit value a/ (mg/Nm3) |
| Spark ignition (= Otto) engines, 4-stroke, > 1 MWth | |
| - Lean-burn engines | 250 |
| - All other engines | 500 |
| Compression ignition (= Diesel) engines, > 5 MWth | |
| - Fuel: natural gas (jet ignition engines)
- Fuel: heavy fuel oil - Fuel: diesel oil or gas oil |
500
600 500 |
a/ These values do not apply to engines running less than 500
hours a year. The O2 reference content is 5%.
|
|
Limit value (mg/Nm3) |
| New and existing sinter plant | 400 |
a/ Production and processing of metals: metal ore roasting or
sintering installations, installations for the production of pig iron or
steel (primary or secondary fusion) including continuous casting with a
capacity exceeding 2.5 Mg/hour, installations for the processing of ferrous
metals (hot rolling mills > 20 Mg/hour of crude steel).
|
|
Limit value (mg/Nm3) |
| - New installations | 350 |
| - Existing installations | 450 |
B. Canada
1/ Monitoring is to be understood as an overall activity, comprising measuring of emissions, mass balancing, etc. It can be carried out continuously or discontinuously.
Annex VI
LIMIT VALUES FOR EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
(ii)
Truck cabins, defined as the housing for the driver, and all integrated
housing for the technical equipment of category N2 and N3 vehicles;
(iii)
Vans and trucks defined as category N1, N2 and N3 vehicles, but excluding
truck cabins;
(iv)
Buses defined as category M2 and M3 vehicles; and
(v)
Other metallic and plastic surfaces including those of aeroplanes, ships,
trains, etc., wooden surfaces, textile, fabric, film and paper surfaces.
This source category does
not include the coating of substrates with metals by electrophoretic or
chemical spraying techniques. If the coating process includes a step in
which the same article is printed, that printing step is considered part
of the coating process. However, printing processes operated as a separate
activity are not included. In this definition:
- M1 vehicles are those used for the carriage of
passengers and comprising not more than eight seats in addition to the
driver's seat;
- M2 vehicles are those used for the carriage of
passengers and comprising more than eight seats in addition to the driver's
seat, and having a maximum mass not exceeding 5 Mg;
- M3 vehicles are those used for the carriage of
passengers and comprising more than eight seats in addition to the driver's
seat, and having a maximum mass exceeding 5 Mg;
- N1 vehicles are those used for the carriage of
goods and having a maximum mass not exceeding 3.5 Mg;
- N2 vehicles are those used for the carriage of
goods and having a maximum mass exceeding 3.5 Mg but not exceeding 12 Mg;
- N3 vehicles are those used for the carriage of
goods and having a maximum mass exceeding 12 Mg.
(ii)
Heat set web offset: a web-fed printing process using an image carrier
in which the printing and non-printing areas are in the same plane, where
web-fed means that the material to be printed is fed to the machine from
a reel as distinct from separate sheets. The non-printing area is treated
to attract water and thus reject ink. The printing area is treated to receive
and transmit ink to the surface to be printed. Evaporation takes place
in an oven where hot air is used to heat the printed material;
(iii)
Publication rotogravure: rotogravure used for printing paper for magazines,
brochures, catalogues or similar products, using toluene-based inks;
(iv)
Rotogravure: a printing process using a cylindrical image carrier in which
the printing area is below the non-printing area, using liquid inks that
dry through evaporation. The recesses are filled with ink and the surplus
is cleaned off the non-printing area before the surface to be printed contacts
the cylinder and lifts the ink from the recesses;
(v)
Rotary screen printing: a web-fed printing process in which the ink is
passed onto the surface to be printed by forcing it through a porous image
carrier, in which the printing area is open and the non-printing area is
sealed off, using liquid inks that dry only through evaporation. Web-fed
means that the material to be printed is fed to the machine from a reel
as distinct from separate sheets;
(vi)
Laminating associated to a printing process: the adhering of two or more
flexible materials to produce laminates; and
(vii)
Varnishing: a process by which a varnish or an adhesive coating is applied
to a flexible material for the purpose of later sealing the packaging material;
(ii)
The original coating of road vehicles, or part of them, with refinishing-type
materials, where this is carried out away from the original manufacturing
line, or
(iii)
The coating of trailers (including semi-trailers);
(ii)
Hazardous substances that are carcinogens, mutagens or toxic to reproduction
or that may cause cancer, may cause heritable genetic damage, may cause
cancer by inhalation, may impair fertility or may cause harm to the unborn
child.
(b)
The concentrations of air pollutants in gas-carrying ducts shall be measured
in a representative way. Sampling and analysis of all pollutants, as well
as reference measurement methods to calibrate any measurement system, shall
be carried out according to the standards laid down by the European Committee
for Standardization (CEN) or by the International Organization for Standardization
(ISO). While awaiting the development of CEN or ISO standards, national
standards shall apply;
(c)
If measurements of emissions of NMVOCs are required, they should be carried
out continuously if emissions of NMVOCs exceed 10 kg of total organic carbon
(TOC)/h in the exhaust duct downstream from an emission reduction installation
and the hours of operation exceed 200 hours a year. For all other installations,
discontinuous measurement is required as a minimum. For the approval of
compliance, own approaches may be used provided that they result in equal
stringency;
(d)
In the case of continuous measurements, as a minimum requirement, compliance
with the emission standards is achieved if the daily mean does not exceed
the limit value during normal operation and no hourly average exceeds the
limit values by 150%. For the approval of compliance, own approaches may
be used provided that they result in equal stringency;
(e)
In the case of discontinuous measurements, as a minimum requirement, compliance
with the emission standards is achieved if the mean value of all readings
does not exceed the limit value and no hourly mean exceeds the limit value
by 150%. For the approval of compliance, own approaches may be used provided
that they result in equal stringency;
(f)
All appropriate precautions shall be taken to minimize emissions of NMVOCs
during start-up and shutdown, and in case of deviations from normal operation;
and
(g)
Measurements are not required if end-of-pipe abatement equipment is not
needed to comply with the limit values below and it can be shown that limit
values are not exceeded.
(a)
20 mg substance/m3 for discharges of halogenated volatile organic
compounds (which are assigned the risk phrase: possible risk of irreversible
effects), where the mass flow of the sum of the considered compounds is
greater than or equal to 100 g/h; and
(b)
2 mg/m3 (expressed as the mass sum of individual compounds)
for discharges of volatile organic compounds (which are assigned the following
risk phrases: may cause cancer, heritable genetic damage, cancer by inhalation
or harm to the unborn child; may impair fertility), where the mass flow
of the sum of the considered compounds is greater than or equal to 10 g/h.
(b)
For fugitive emissions of NMVOCs, the fugitive emission values set out
below shall be applied as a limit value. However, where it is demonstrated
to the satisfaction of the competent authority that for an individual installation
this value is not technically and economically feasible, the competent
authority may exempt that installation provided that significant risks
to human health or the environment are not expected. For each derogation,
the operator must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority
that the best available technique is used.
|
|
|
|
| Vapour recovery unit serving storage and distribution facilities at refinery tank farms or terminals | 5000 m3 petrol throughput annually | 10 g VOC/Nm3 including methane |
Note: The vapour displaced by the filling of petrol storage
tanks shall be displaced either into other storage tanks or into abatement
equipment meeting the limit values in the table above.
|
|
|
|
Limit value for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs (% of solvent input) |
| Footwear manufacture; new and existing installations | > 5 | 25 g solvent per pair | |
| Other adhesive coating, except footwear; new and existing installations | 5 - 15 | 50a/ mg C/Nm3 | 25 |
| > 15 | 50a/ mg C/Nm3 | 20 |
a/ If techniques are used which allow reuse of recovered solvent,
the limit value shall be 150 mg C/Nm3.
|
|
|
|
| Wood and plastic laminating; new and existing installations | > 5 | 30 g NMVOC/m2 |
|
|
Threshold value for solvent consumption (Mg/year)a/ | Limit value b/ for total emissions of NMVOCs |
| New installations, car coating (M1, M2) | > 15 (and > 5,000 coated items a year) | 45 g NMVOC/m2 or 1.3 kg/item and
33 g NMVOC/m2 |
| Existing installations, car coating (M1, M2) | > 15 (and > 5,000 coated items a year) | 60 g NMVOC /m2 or 1.9 kg/item and
41 g NMVOC/m2 |
| New and existing installations, car coating (M1, M2) | > 15 ( 5,000 coated monocoques or > 3,500 coated chassis a year) | 90 g NMVOC/m2 or 1.5 kg/item and
70 g NMVOC/m2 |
| New installations, coating of new truck cabins (N1, N2, N3) | > 15 ( 5,000 coated items a year) | 65 g NMVOC/m2 |
| New installations, coating of new truck cabins (N1, N2, N3) | > 15 (> 5,000 coated items a year) | 55 g NMVOC/m2 |
| Existing installations, coating of new truck cabins (N1, N2, N3) | > 15 ( 5,000 coated items a year) | 85 g NMVOC/m2 |
| Existing installations, coating of new truck cabins (N1, N2, N3) | > 15 (> 5,000 coated items a year) | 75 g NMVOC/m2 |
| New installations, coating of new trucks and vans (without cabin) (N1, N2, N3) | > 15 ( 2,500 coated items a year) | 90 g NMVOC/m2 |
| New installations, coating of new trucks and vans (without cabin) (N1, N2, N3) | > 15 (> 2,500 coated items a year) | 70 g NMVOC/m2 |
| Existing installations, coating of new trucks and vans (without cabin) (N1, N2, N3) | > 15 ( 2,500 coated items a year) | 120 g NMVOC/m2 |
| Existing installations, coating of new trucks and vans (without cabin) (N1, N2, N3) | > 15 (> 2,500 coated items a year) | 90 g NMVOC/m2 |
| New installations, coating of new buses (M3) | > 15 ( 2,000 coated items a year) | 210 g NMVOC/m2 |
| New installations, coating of new buses (M3) | > 15 (> 2,000 coated items a year) | 150 g NMVOC/m2 |
| Existing installations, coating of new buses (M3) | > 15 ( 2,000 coated items a year) | 290 g NMVOC/m2 |
| Existing installations, coating of new buses (M3) | > 15 (> 2,000 coated items a year) | 225 g NMVOC/m2 |
a/ For a solvent consumption 15 Mg a year (coating of cars),
table 14 on car refinishing applies.
b/ The total limit values are expressed in terms of mass of solvent
(g) emitted in relation to the surface area of product (m2).
The surface area of the product is defined as the surface area calculated
from the total electrophoretic coating area and the surface area of any
parts that might be added in successive phases of the coating process which
are coated with the same coatings. The surface of the electrophoretic coating
area is calculated using the formula: (2 x total weight of product shell):
(average thickness of metal sheet x density of metal sheet).
Table 5. Limit values for NMVOC emissions released from coating processes in various industrial sectors
|
|
|
|
Limit value for fugitive emission of NMVOCs (% of solvent input) |
| New and existing installations: other coating, incl. metal, plastics, textile, fabric, foil and paper (excl. web screen printing for textiles, see printing) |
|
100 a/ b/ mg C/Nm3 |
|
|
|
50/75 b/ c/ d/
mg C/Nm3 |
|
|
| New and existing installations: wood coating | 15 - 25 | 100 a/ mg C/Nm3 | 25 |
| > 25 | 50/75 c/ mg C/Nm3 | 20 |
a/ Limit value applies to coating applications and drying processes
operated under contained conditions.
b/ If contained coating conditions are not possible (boat construction,
aircraft coating, etc.), installations may be granted exemption from these
values. The reduction scheme of paragraph 6 (a) is then to be used, unless
it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the competent authority that
this option is not technically and economically feasible. In this case,
the operator must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority
that the best available technique is used.
c/ The first value applies to drying processes, the second to
coating application processes.
d/ If, for textile coating, techniques are used which allow reuse
of recovered solvents, the limit value shall be 150 mg C/Nm3
for drying and coating together.
|
|
|
Limit value
(mg C/Nm3) |
Limit value for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs (% of solvent input) |
| New installations | > 25 | 50 a/ | 5 |
| Existing installations | > 25 | 50 a/ | 10 |
a/ If techniques are used which allow reuse of recovered solvent,
the limit value shall be 150 mg C/Nm3.
|
|
|
|
| New and existing installations |
|
|
a/ Limit value for total emissions of NMVOCs calculated as mass
of emitted solvent per mass of cleaned and dried product.
|
|
|
Limit value
(mg C/Nm3) |
Limit value for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs (% of solvent input) |
| New and existing installations | 100 - 1,000 | 150 a/ | 5 a/ c/ |
| > 1,000 | 150 b/ | 3 b/ c/ |
a/ A total limit value of 5% of solvent input may be applied
instead of using the waste gas concentration limit and the limit value
for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs.
b/ A total limit value of 3% of solvent input may be applied
instead of using the waste gas concentration limit and the limit value
for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs.
c/ The fugitive limit value does not include solvents sold as
part of a preparation in a sealed container.
|
|
|
Limit value
(mg C/Nm3) |
Limit value for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs (% of solvent input) |
| New and existing installations: heat set web offset | 15 - 25 |
|
|
| > 25 |
|
|
|
| New installations: publication rotogravure | > 25 |
|
|
| Existing installations: publication rotogravure | > 25 |
|
|
| New and existing installations: other rotogravure, flexography,
rotary screen printing, lamination and varnishing units |
15 - 25 |
|
|
| > 25 |
|
|
|
| New and existing installations: rotary screen printing on textiles, paperboard | > 30 |
|
|
a/ Solvent residue in finished products is not to be considered
as part of the fugitive emissions of NMVOCs.
Table 10. Limit values for NMVOC emissions released from manufacturing of pharmaceutical products
| Capacity, technique, further specification | Threshold value for solvent consumption (Mg/year) | Limit value
(mg C/Nm3) |
Limit value for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs (% of solvent input) |
| New installations | > 50 | 20 a/ b/ | 5b/ d/ |
| Existing installations | > 50 | 20 a/ c/ | 15c/ d/ |
a/ If techniques are used which allow reuse of recovered solvents,
the limit value shall be 150 mg C/Nm3.
b/ A total limit value of 5% of solvent input may be applied
instead of using the waste gas concentration limit and the limit value
for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs.
c/ A total limit value of 15% of solvent input may be applied
instead of using the waste gas concentration limit and the limit value
for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs.
d/ The fugitive limit value does not include solvents sold as
part of a coatings preparation in a sealed container.
|
|
|
Limit value
(mg C/Nm3) |
Limit value for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs (% of solvent input) |
| New and existing installations: conversion of natural or synthetic rubber | > 15 | 20 a/ b/ | 25 a/ c/ |
a/ A total limit value of 25% of solvent input may be applied
instead of using the waste gas concentration limit and the limit value
for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs.
b/ If techniques are used which allow reuse of recovered solvent,
the limit value shall be 150 mg C/Nm3.
c/ The fugitive limit does not include solvents sold as part
of a preparation in a sealed container.
|
further specification |
|
|
Limit value for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs (% of solvent input) |
| New and existing installations: surface cleaning using substances mentioned in paragraph 3 (w) | 1 - 5 | 20 mg compound/Nm3 | 15 |
| > 5 | 20 mg compound/Nm3 | 10 | |
| New and existing installations: other surface cleaning | 2 - 10 | 75 mg C/Nm3 a/ | 20 a/ |
| > 10 |
75 mg C/Nm3 a/
|
15 a/ |
a/ Installations which demonstrate to the competent authority that the average organic solvent content of all cleaning material used does not exceed 30% w/w are exempt from applying these values.
|
|
|
Total limit value
(kg/Mg) |
| New and existing installations |
|
Animal fat: 1.5
Castor: 3.0 Rape seed: 1.0 Sunflower seed: 1.0 Soya beans (normal crush): 0.8 Soya beans (white flakes): 1.2 Other seeds and vegetable material: 3.0a/ All fractionation processes, excl. degumming b/: 1.5 Degumming: 4.0 |
a/ Limit values for total emissions of NMVOCs from installations
treating single batches of seeds or other vegetable material shall be set
case by case by the competent authorities on the basis of the best available
technologies.
b/ The removal of gum from the oil.
|
|
|
Limit value
(mg C/Nm3) |
Limit value for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs (% of solvent input) |
| New and existing installations |
|
|
|
a/ Compliance with limit values to be proven by 15-minute average
measurements.
|
|
|
Limit value
(mg C/Nm3) |
Limit value for fugitive emission of NMVOCs
(% of solvent input) |
| New and existing installations |
|
|
|
a/ Does not apply to impregnation with creosote.
b/ A total limit value of 11 kg solvent/m3 of wood
treated may be applied instead of using the waste gas concentration limit
and the limit value for fugitive emissions of NMVOCs.
B. Canada
1/ Monitoring is to be understood as an overall activity, comprising measuring of emissions, mass balancing, etc. It can be carried out continuously or discontinuously.
Appendix I
SOLVENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Introduction
(b)
Identification of future reduction options.
Definitions
I1.
The quantity of organic solvents or their quantity in preparations purchased
that are used as input into the process in the time frame over which the
mass balance is being calculated.
I2.
The quantity of organic solvents or their quantity in preparations recovered
and reused as solvent input into the process. (The recycled solvent is
counted every time it is used to carry out the activity.)
(b)
Outputs of organic solvents:
O1.
Emission of NMVOCs in waste gases.
O2.
Organic solvents lost in water, if appropriate taking into account waste-water
treatment when calculating O5.
O3.
The quantity of organic solvents that remains as contamination or residue
in output of products from the process.
O4.
Uncaptured emissions of organic solvents to air. This includes the general
ventilation of rooms, where air is released to the outside environment
via windows, doors, vents and similar openings.
O5.
Organic solvents and/or organic compounds lost due to chemical or physical
reactions (including, for example, those that are destroyed, e.g. by incineration
or other waste-gas or waste-water treatments, or captured, e.g. by adsorption,
as long as they are not counted under O6, O7 or O8).
O6.
Organic solvents contained in collected waste.
O7. Organic solvents, or organic solvents contained in preparations, that are sold or are intended to be sold as a commercially valuable product.
O8.
Organic solvents contained in preparations recovered for reuse but not
as input into the process, as long as they are not counted under O7.
O9.
Organic solvents released in other ways.
Guidance on use of the solvent management plan for verification
of compliance
(i) For all activities using the reduction option
mentioned in paragraph 6 (a) of the annex, the solvent management plan
should be put into effect annually to determine consumption.
Consumption can be calculated by means of the following equation:
C = I1 - O8
A parallel exercise should
also be undertaken to determine solids used in coating in order to derive
the annual reference emission and the target emission each year;
(ii) For assessing compliance with a total limit value expressed in solvent emissions per unit product or as otherwise stated in the annex, the solvent management plan should be put into effect annually to determine emission of NMVOCs. Emission of NMVOCs can be calculated by means of the following equation:
E = F + O1
Where F is the fugitive emission
of NMVOC as defined in subparagraph (b) (i) below. The emission figure
should be divided by the relevant product parameter;
(b)
Determination of fugitive emission of NMVOCs for comparison with fugitive
emission values in the annex:
(i) Methodology: The fugitive emission of NMVOC can be calculated by means of the following equation:
F = I1 - O1 - O5 - O6 - O7 - O8
or
F = O2 + O3 + O4 + O9
This
quantity can be determined by direct measurement of the quantities. Alternatively,
an equivalent calculation can be made by other means, for instance by using
the capture efficiency of the process.
The fugitive emission value is expressed as a proportion of the input, which can be calculated by means of the following equation:
I = I1 + I2
(ii) Frequency: Fugitive emission of NMVOCs can be determined by a short but comprehensive set of measurements. This need not to be done again until the equipment is modified.
Appendix II
REDUCTION SCHEME
Principles
(b) The reference point for emission reductions should correspond as
closely as possible to the emissions that would have resulted had no reduction
action been taken.
| Time period | Maximum allowed total annual emissions | |
| New installations | Existing installations | |
| By 31.10.2001 | By 31.10.2005 | Target emission x 1.5 |
| By 31.10.2004 | By 31.10.2007 | Target emission |
(b)
The annual reference emission is calculated as follows:
(i) The total mass of solids in the quantity of
coating and/or ink, varnish or adhesive consumed in a year is determined.
Solids are all materials in coatings, inks, varnishes and adhesives that
become solid once the water or the volatile organic compounds are evaporated;
(ii) The annual reference emissions are calculated
by multiplying the mass determined as in subparagraph (i) by the appropriate
factor listed in the table below. The competent authorities may adjust
these factors for individual installations to reflect documented increased
efficiency in the use of solids.
| Activity | Multiplication factor for use in subparagraph (b) (ii) |
| Rotogravure printing; flexography printing; laminating as part of a printing activity; printing; varnishing as part of a printing activity; wood coating; coating of textiles, fabric, film or paper; adhesive coating | 4 |
| Coil coating; vehicle refinishing | 3 |
| Food contact coating; aerospace coating | 2.33 |
| Other coatings and rotary screen printing | 1.5 |
(iii)
The target emission is equal to the annual reference emission multiplied
by a percentage equal to:
- (The fugitive emission value + 15), for installations
in the following sectors:
- Vehicle coating (solvent consumption < 15 Mg/year)
and vehicle refinishing;
- Metal, plastic, textile, fabric, film and paper
coating (solvent consumption between 5 and 15 Mg/year);
- Coating of wooden surfaces (solvent consumption
between 15 and 25 Mg/year).
- (The fugitive emission value + 5) for all other
installations;
(iv)
Compliance is achieved if the actual solvent emission determined from the
solvent management plan is less than or equal to the target emission.
Annex VII
TIMESCALES UNDER ARTICLE 3
1. The timescales for
the application of the limit values referred to in article 3, paragraphs
2 and 3, shall be:
(a)
For new stationary sources, one year after the date of entry into force
of the present Protocol for the Party in question; and
(b)
For existing stationary sources:
(i) In the case of a Party that is not a country
with an economy in transition, one year after the date of entry into force
of the present Protocol or 31 December 2007, whichever is the later; and
(ii) In the case of a Party that is a country with
an economy in transition, eight years after the entry into force of the
present Protocol.
2. The timescales for
the application of the limit values for fuels and new mobile sources referred
to in article 3, paragraph 5, and the limit values for gas oil referred
to in annex IV, table 2, shall be:
(i) In the case of a Party that is not a country
with an economy in transition, the date of entry into force of the present
Protocol or the dates associated with the measures specified in annex VIII
and with the limit values specified in annex IV, table 2, whichever is
the later; and
(ii) In the case of a Party that is a country with
an economy in transition, five years after the date of entry into force
of the present Protocol or five years after the dates associated with the
measures specified in annex VIII and with the limit values in annex IV,
table 2, whichever is the later.
This
timescale shall not apply to a Party to the present Protocol to the extent
that that Party is subject to a shorter timescale with regard to gas oil
under the Protocol on Further Reduction of Sulphur Emissions.
3. For the purpose of
the present annex, "a country with an economy in transition" means a Party
that has made with its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval
or accession a declaration that it wishes to be treated as a country with
an economy in transition for the purposes of paragraphs 1 and/or 2 of this
annex.
Annex VIII
LIMIT VALUES FOR FUELS AND NEW MOBILE SOURCES
Introduction
3. The timescales for applying the limit values
in this annex are laid down in annex VII.
A. Parties other than Canada and the United States of America
Passenger cars and light-duty vehicles
4. Limit values for power-driven vehicles with
at least four wheels and used for the carriage of passengers (category
M) and goods (category N) are given in table 1.
Heavy-duty vehicles
5. Limit values for engines for heavy-duty vehicles
are given in tables 2 and 3 depending on the applicable test procedures.
Motorcycles and mopeds
6. Limit values for motorcycles and mopeds are
given in table 6 and table 7.
Non-road vehicles and machines
7. Limit values for agricultural and forestry
tractors and other non-road vehicle/machine engines are listed in tables
4 and 5. Stage I (table 4) is based on ECE regulation 96, "Uniform provisions
concerning the approval of compression-ignition (C.I.) engines to be installed
in agricultural and forestry tractors with regard to the emissions of pollutants
by the engine".
Fuel quality
8. Environmental quality specifications for petrol and diesel are given in tables 8 to 11.
| Reference mass
(RW) (kg) |
Limit values | ||||||||||||
| Carbon monoxide | Hydrocarbons | Nitrogen oxides | Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides combined | Particulates a/ | |||||||||
| L1 (g/km) | L2 (g/km) | L3 (g/km) | L2+L3 (g/km) | L4 (g/km) | |||||||||
| Category | Class | To be applied from b/ | Petrol | Diesel | Petrol | Diesel | Petrol | Diesel | Petrol | Diesel | Diesel | ||
| A | M c/ | 1.1.2001 | All g/ | 2.3 | 0.64 | 0.20 | - | 0.15 | 0.50 | - | 0.56 | 0.05 | |
| N1 d/ | I | 1.1.2001 e/ | RW 1305 | 2.3 | 0.64 | 0.20 | - | 0.15 | 0.50 | - | 0.56 | 0.05 | |
| II | 1.1.2002 | 1305 < RW 1760 | 4.17 | 0.80 | 0.25 | - | 0.18 | 0.65 | - | 0.72 | 0.07 | ||
| III | 1.1.2002 | 1760 < RW | 5.22 | 0.95 | 0.29 | - | 0.21 | 0.78 | - | 0.86 | 0.10 | ||
| B | M c/ | 1.1.2006 | All | 1.0 | 0.50 | 0.10 | - | 0.08 | 0.25 | - | 0.30 | 0.025 | |
| N1 d/ | I | 1.1.2006 f/ | RW 1305 | 1.0 | 0.50 | 0.10 | - | 0.08 | 0.25 | - | 0.30 | 0.025 | |
| II | 1.1.2007 | 1305 < RW 1760 | 1.81 | 0.63 | 0.13 | - | 0.10 | 0.33 | - | 0.39 | 0.04 | ||
| III | 1.1.2007 | 1760 < RW | 2.27 | 0.74 | 0.16 | - | 0.11 | 0.39 | - | 0.46 | 0.06 | ||
a/ For compression-ignition engines.
b/ The registration, sale or entry into service of new vehicles
that fail to comply with the respective limit values shall be refused as
from the dates given in this column and type approval may no longer be
granted with effect from 12 months prior to these dates.
c/ Except vehicles whose maximum mass exceeds 2,500 kg.
d/ And those category M vehicles specified in note c.
e/ 1.1.2002 for those category M vehicles specified in note c.
f/ 1.1.2007 for those category M vehicles specified in note c.
g/ Until 1 January 2003 vehicles in this category fitted with compression-ignition engines that are non-road vehicles and vehicles with a maximum mass of more than 2,000 kg which are designed to carry more than six occupants, including the driver, shall be considered as vehicles in category N1, class III, in row A.
Table 2. Limit values for heavy-duty vehicles - European steady-state cycle (ESC) and European load-response (ELR) tests
| Row | To be applied from a/ | Carbon monoxide (g/kWh) | Hydrocarbons (g/kWh) | Nitrogen oxides (g/kWh) | Particulates (g/kWh) | Smoke
(m-1) |
| A | 1.10.2001 | 2.1 | 0.66 | 5.0 | 0.10 / 0.13b/ | 0.8 |
| B1 | 1.10.2006 | 1.5 | 0.46 | 3.5 | 0.02 | 0.5 |
| B2 | 1.10.2009 | 1.5 | 0.46 | 2.0 | 0.02 | 0.5 |
a/ With effect from the given dates and except for vehicles and
engines intended for export to countries that are not parties to the present
Protocol and for replacement engines for vehicles in use, Parties shall
prohibit the registration, sale, entry into service or use of new vehicles
propelled by a compression ignition or gas engine and the sale and use
of new compression-ignition or gas engines if their emissions do not comply
with the respective limit values. With effect from twelve months prior
to these dates, type approval may be refused if the limit values are not
complied with.
b/ For engines with a swept volume below 0.75 dm3
per cylinder and a rated power speed above 3000 revolutions per minute.
Table 3. Limit values for heavy-duty vehicles - European transient cycle (ETC) test a/
| Row | To be applied from b/ | Carbon monoxide (g/kWh) | Non-methane hydrocarbons (g/kWh) | Methane c/ (g/kWh) | Nitrogen oxides (g/kWh) | Prticulates d/ |
| A (2000) | 1.10.2001 | 5.45 | 0.78 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 0.16 / 0.21e/ |
| B1 (2005) | 1.10.2006 | 4.0 | 0.55 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 0.03 |
| B2 (2008) | 1.10.2009 | 4.0 | 0.55 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 0.03 |
a/ The conditions for verifying the acceptability of the ETC
tests when measuring the emissions of gas-fuelled engines against the limit
values applicable in row A shall be re-examined and, where necessary, modified
in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 13 of Directive 70/156/EEC.
b/ With effect from the given dates and except for vehicles and
engines intended for export to countries that are not parties to the present
Protocol and for replacement engines for vehicles in use, Parties shall
prohibit the registration, sale, entry into service or use of new vehicles
propelled by a compression-ignition or gas engine and the sale and use
of new compression-ignition or gas engines if their emissions do not comply
with the respective limit values. With effect from twelve months prior
to these dates, type approval may be refused if the limit values are not
complied with.
c/ For natural gas engines only.
d/ Not applicable to gas-fuelled engines at stage A and stages
B1 and B2.
e/ For engines with a swept volume below 0.75 dm3
per cylinder and a rated power speed above 3000 revolutions per minute.
Table 4. Limit values (stage I) for diesel engines for non-road mobile machines (measurement procedure ISO 8178)
|
(kW) |
To be applied from a/ | Carbon monoxide
(g/kWh) |
Hydrocarbons
(g/kWh) |
Nitrogen oxides
(g/kWh) |
Particulate matter (g/kWh) |
| 130 P < 560
75 P < 130 37 P < 75 |
31.12.1998
31.12.1998 31.03.1998 |
5.0
5.0 6.5 |
1.3
1.3 1.3 |
9.2
9.2 9.2 |
0.54
0.70 0.85 |
a/ With effect from the given date and with the exception of
machinery and engines intended for export to countries that are not parties
to the present Protocol, Parties shall permit the registration, where applicable,
and placing on the market of new engines, whether or not installed in machinery,
only if they meet the limit values set out in the table. Type approval
for an engine type or family shall be refused with effect from 30 June
1998 if it fails to meet the limit values.
Note: These limits are engine-out limits and shall be
achieved before any exhaust after-treatment service.
Table 5. Limit values (stage II) for diesel engines for non-road mobile machines (measurement procedure ISO 8178)
| Net power (P)
(kW) |
To be applied from a/ | Carbon monoxide
(g/kWh) |
Hydrocarbons
(g/kWh) |
Nitrogen oxides (g/kWh) | Particulate
matter (g/kWh) |
| 130 P < 560
75 P < 130 37 P < 75 18 P < 37 |
31.12.2001
31.12.2002 31.12.2003 31.12.2000 |
3.5
5.0 5.0 5.5 |
1.0
1.0 1.3 1.5 |
6.0
6.0 7.0 8.0 |
0.2
0.3 0.4 0.8 |
a/ With effect from the given dates and with the exception of
machinery and engines intended for export to countries that are not parties
to the present Protocol, Parties shall permit the registration, where applicable,
and placing on the market of new engines, whether or not installed in machinery,
only if they meet the limit values set out in the table. Type approval
for an engine type or family shall be refused with effect from twelve months
prior to these dates if it fails to meet the limit values.
Table 6. Limit values for motorcycles and 3- and 4-wheelers (> 50 cm3; > 45 km/h) to be applied from 17 June 1999 a/
|
|
Limit values |
| 2-stroke | CO = 8 g/km
HC = 4 g/km NOx = 0.1 g/km |
| 4-stroke | CO = 13 g/km
HC = 3 g/km NOx = 0.3 g/km |
a/ Type approval shall be refused as from the given date if the
vehicle's emissions do not meet the limit values.
Note: For 3- and 4-wheelers, the limit values have to
be multiplied by 1.5.
Table 7. Limit values for mopeds ( 50 cm3; < 45 km/h)
|
|
To be applied from a/ | Limit values | |
|
|
|
||
|
|
17.6.1999 | 6.0 b/ | 3.0 b/ |
| II | 17.6.2002 | 1.0 c/ | 1.2 |
a/ Type approval shall be refused as from the given dates if
the vehicle's emissions do not meet the limit values.
b/ For 3- and 4-wheelers, multiply by 2.
c/ For 3- and 4-wheelers, 3.5 g/km.
Table 8. Environmental specifications for marketed fuels to be used for vehicles equipped with positive-ignition engines
Type: Petrol
| Parameter | Unit | Limits a/ | Test | ||
| Minimum | Maximum | Method b/ | Date of publication | ||
| Research octane number | 95 | - | EN 25164 | 1993 | |
| Motor octane number | 85 | - | EN 25163 | 1993 | |
| Reid vapour pressure, summer period c/ | kPa | - | 60 | EN 12 | 1993 |
| Distillation: | |||||
| evaporated at 100°C | % v/v | 46 | - | EN-ISO 3405 | 1988 |
| evaporated at 150°C | % v/v | 75 | - | ||
| Hydrocarbon analysis: | |||||
| - olefins | % v/v | - | 18.0 d/ | ASTM D1319 | 1995 |
| - aromatics | - | 42 | ASTM D1319 | 1995 | |
| - benzene | - | 1 | project EN 12177 | 1995 | |
| Oxygen content | % m/m | - | 2.7 | EN 1601 | 1996 |
| Oxygenates: | |||||
| - Methanol, stabilizing agents must be added | % v/v | - | 3 | EN 1601 | 1996 |
| - Ethanol, stabilizing agents may be necessary | % v/v | - | 5 | EN 1601 | 1996 |
| - Isopropyl alcohol | % v/v | - | 10 | EN 1601 | 1996 |
| - Tert-butyl alcohol | % v/v | - | 7 | EN 1601 | 1996 |
| - Iso-butyl alcohol | % v/v | - | 10 | EN 1601 | 1996 |
| - Ethers containing 5 or more carbon atoms per molecule | % v/v | - | 15 | EN 1601 | 1996 |
| Other oxygenates e/ | % v/v | - | 10 | EN 1601 | 1996 |
| Sulphur content | mg/kg | - | 150 | project EN-ISO/DIS 14596 | 1996 |
a/ The values quoted in the specification are 'true values'.
In the establishment of their limit values, the terms of ISO 259, "Petroleum
products - Determination and application of precision data in relation
to methods of test", have been applied and, in fixing a minimum value,
a minimum difference of 2R above zero has been taken into account (R =
reproducibility). The results of individual measurements shall be interpreted
on the basis of the criteria described in ISO 4259 (published in 1995).
b/ EN - European standard; ASTM - American Society for Testing
and Materials; DIS - Draft international standard.
c/ The summer period shall begin no later than 1 May and shall
not end before 30 September. For member States with arctic conditions the
summer period shall begin no later than 1 June and not end before 31 August
and the RVP is limited to 70 kPa.
d/ Except for regular unleaded petrol(minimum motor octane number
(MON) of 81 and minimum research octane number (RON) of 91), for which
the maximum olefin content shall be 21% v/v. These limits shall not preclude
the introduction on the market of a member State of another unleaded petrol
with lower octane numbers than set out here.
e/ Other mono-alcohols with a final distillation point no higher
than the final distillation point laid down in national specifications
or, where these do not exist, in industrial specifications for motor fuels.
Note: Parties shall ensure that, no later than 1 January
2000, petrol can be marketed within their territory only if it complies
with the environmental specifications set out in table 8. Where a Party
determines that banning petrol with a sulphur content which does not comply
with the specifications for sulphur content in table 8, but does not exceed
the current content, would raise severe difficulties for its industries
in making the necessary changes in their manufacturing facilities by 1
January 2000, it may extend the time period of marketing within its territory
until 1 January 2003 at the latest. In such a case the Party shall specify,
in a declaration to be deposited together with its instrument of ratification,
acceptance, approval or accession, that it intends to extend the time period
and present written information on the reason for this to the Executive
Body.
Table 9. Environmental specifications for marketed fuels to be used for vehicles equipped with compression-ignition engines
Type: Diesel fuel
| Parameter | Unit | Limits a/ | Test | ||
| Minimum | Maximum | Method b/ | Date of publication | ||
| Cetane number | 51 | - | EN-ISO 5165 | 1992 | |
| Density at 15°C | kg/m3 | - | 845 | EN-ISO 3675 | 1995 |
| Distillation point: 95% | °C | - | 360 | EN-ISO 3405 | 1988 |
| Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons | % m/m | - | 11 | IP 391 | 1995 |
| Sulphur content | mg/kg | - | 350 | project EN-ISO/DIS 14596 | 1996 |
a/ The values quoted in the specification are 'true values'.
In the establishment of their limit values, the terms of ISO 4259, "Petroleum
products - Determination and application of precision data in relation
to methods of test", have been applied and, in fixing a minimum value,
a minimum difference of 2R above zero has been taken into account (R =
reproducibility). The results of individual measurements shall be interpreted
on the basis of the criteria described in ISO 4259 (published in 1995).
b/ EN - European standard; IP - The Institute of Petroleum; DIS
- Draft international standard.
Note: Parties shall ensure that, no later than 1 January
2000, diesel fuel can be marketed within their territory only if it complies
with the environmental specifications set out in table 9. Where a Party
determines that banning diesel fuel with a sulphur content which does not
comply with the specifications for sulphur content in table 9, but does
not exceed the current content, would raise severe difficulties for its
industries in making the necessary changes in their manufacturing facilities
by 1 January 2000, it may extend the time period of marketing within its
territory until 1 January 2003 at the latest. In such a case the Party
shall specify, in a declaration to be deposited together with its instrument
of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, that it intends to
extend the time period and present written information on the reason for
this to the Executive Body.
Table 10. Environmental specifications for marketed fuels to be used for vehicles equipped with positive-ignition engines
Type: Petrol
| Parameter | Unit | Limits a/ | Test | ||
| Minimum | Maximum | Method b/ | Date of publication | ||
| Research octane number | 95 | EN 25164 | 1993 | ||
| Motor octane number | 85 | EN 5163 | 1993 | ||
| Reid vapour pressure, summer period | kPa | - | |||
| Distillation: | |||||
| evaporated at 100°C | % v/v | - | - | ||
| evaporated at 150°C | - | - | |||
| Hydrocarbon analysis: | |||||
| - olefins | % v/v | - | |||
| - aromatics | % v/v | - | 35 |
|
1995 |
| - benzene | % v/v | - | |||
| Oxygen content | % m/m | - | |||
| Sulphur content | mg/kg | - | 50 | project EN-ISO/DIS 14596 | 1996 |
a/ The values quoted in the specification are 'true values'.
In the establishment of their limit values, the terms of ISO 4259, "Petroleum
products - Determination and application of precision data in relation
to methods of test", have been applied and, in fixing a minimum value,
a minimum difference of 2R above zero has been taken into account (R =
reproducibility). The results of individual measurements shall be interpreted
on the basis of the criteria described in ISO 4259 (published in 1995).
b/ EN - European standard; ASTM - American Society for Testing
and Materials; DIS - Draft international standard.
Note: Parties shall ensure that, no later than 1 January
2005, petrol can be marketed within their territory only if it complies
with the environmental specifications set out in table 10. Where a Party
determines that banning petrol with a sulphur content which does not comply
with the specifications for sulphur content in table 10, but does comply
with table 8, would raise severe difficulties for its industries in making
the necessary changes in their manufacturing facilities by 1 January 2005,
it may extend the time period of marketing within its territory until 1
January 2007 at the latest. In such a case the Party shall specify, in
a declaration to be deposited together with its instrument of ratification,
acceptance, approval or accession, that it intends to extend the time period
and present written information on the reason for this to the Executive
Body.
Table 11. Environmental specifications for marketed fuels to be used for vehicles equipped with compression-ignition engines
Type: Diesel fuel
| Parameter | Unit | Limits a/ | Test | ||
| Minimum | Maximum | Method b/ | Date of publication | ||
| Cetane number | - | ||||
| Density at 15°C | kg/m3 | - | |||
| Distillation point: 95% | °C | - | |||
| Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons | % m/m | - | |||
| Sulphur content | mg/kg | - | 50 | project EN-ISO/DIS 14596 | 1996 |
a/ The values quoted in the specification are 'true values'.
In the establishment of their limit values, the terms of ISO 4259, "Petroleum
products - Determination and application of precision data in relation
to methods of test", have been applied and, in fixing a minimum value,
a minimum difference of 2R above zero has been taken into account (R =reproducibility).
The results of individual measurements shall be interpreted on the basis
of the criteria described in ISO 4259.
b/ EN - European standard; DIS - Draft international standard.
Note: Parties shall ensure that, no later than 1 January
2005, diesel fuel can be marketed within their territory only if it complies
with the environmental specifications set out in table 11. Where a Party
determines that banning diesel fuel with a sulphur content which does not
comply with the specifications for sulphur content in table 11, but does
comply with table 9, would raise severe difficulties for its industries
in making the necessary changes in their manufacturing facilities by 1
January 2005, it may extend the time period of marketing within its territory
until 1 January 2007 at the latest. In such a case the Party shall specify,
in a declaration to be deposited together with its instrument of ratification,
acceptance, approval or accession, that it intends to extend the time period
and present written information on the reason for this to the Executive
Body.
B. Canada
(b)
40 C.F.R. Part 86, Subpart A - General Provisions for Emission Regulations;
(c)
40 C.F.R. Part 80, section 80.29 -- Controls and Prohibitions on Diesel
Fuel Quality.
Annex IX
MEASURES FOR THE CONTROL OF EMISSIONS OF AMMONIA FROM AGRICULTURAL SOURCES
1. The Parties that
are subject to obligations in article 3, paragraph 8 (a), shall take the
measures set out in this annex.
2. Each Party shall
take due account of the need to reduce losses from the whole nitrogen cycle.
A. Advisory code of good agricultural practice
3. Within one year from
the date of entry into force of the present Protocol for it, a Party shall
establish, publish and disseminate an advisory code of good agricultural
practice to control ammonia emissions. The code shall take into account
the specific conditions within the territory of the Party and shall include
provisions on:
- Nitrogen management, taking
account of the whole nitrogen cycle;
- Livestock feeding strategies;
- Low-emission manure spreading
techniques;
- Low-emission manure storage
systems;
- Low-emission animal housing
systems; and
- Possibilities for limiting
ammonia emissions from the use of mineral fertilizers.
Parties should give a title
to the code with a view to avoiding confusion with other codes of guidance.
B. Urea and ammonium carbonate fertilizers
4. Within one year from
the date of entry into force of the present Protocol for it, a Party shall
take such steps as are feasible to limit ammonia emissions from the use
of solid fertilizers based on urea.
5. Within one year from
the date of entry into force of the present Protocol for it, a Party shall
prohibit the use of ammonium carbonate fertilizers.
C. Manure application
6. Each Party shall
ensure that low-emission slurry application techniques (as listed in guidance
document V adopted by the Executive Body at its seventeenth session (decision
1999/1) and any amendments thereto) that have been shown to reduce emissions
by at least 30% compared to the reference specified in that guidance document
are used as far as the Party in question considers them applicable, taking
account of local soil and geomorphological conditions, slurry type and
farm structure. The timescales for the application of these measures shall
be: 31 December 2009 for Parties with economies in transition and 31 December
2007 for other Parties. 1/
7. Within one year from
the date of entry into force of the present Protocol for it, a Party shall
ensure that solid manure applied to land to be ploughed shall be incorporated
within at least 24 hours of spreading as far as it considers this measure
applicable, taking account of local soil and geomorphological conditions
and farm structure.
D. Manure storage
8. Within one year from
the date of entry into force of the present Protocol for it, a Party shall
use for new slurry stores on large pig and poultry farms of 2,000 fattening
pigs or 750 sows or 40,000 poultry, low-emission storage systems or techniques
that have been shown to reduce emissions by 40% or more compared to the
reference (as listed in the guidance document referred to in paragraph
6), or other systems or techniques with a demonstrably equivalent efficiency.
2/
9. For existing slurry
stores on large pig and poultry farms of 2,000 fattening pigs or 750 sows
or 40,000 poultry, a Party shall achieve emission reductions of 40% insofar
as the Party considers the necessary techniques to be technically and economically
feasible. 2/ The timescales for the application of these measures
shall be: 31 December 2009 for Parties with economies in transition and
31 December 2007 for all other Parties. 1/
E. Animal housing
10. Within one year
from the date of entry into force of the present Protocol for it, a Party
shall use, for new animal housing on large pig and poultry farms of 2,000
fattening pigs or 750 sows or 40,000 poultry, housing systems which have
been shown to reduce emissions by 20% or more compared to the reference
(as listed in the guidance document referred to in paragraph 6), or other
systems or techniques with a demonstrably equivalent efficiency. 2/
Applicability may be limited for animal welfare reasons, for instance in
straw-based systems for pigs and aviary and free-range systems for poultry.
Notes
1/ For the purpose of the present annex, "a country with an economy
in transition" means a Party that has made with its instrument of ratification,
acceptance, approval or accession a declaration that it wishes to be treated
as a country with an economy in transition for the purposes of paragraphs
6 and/or 9 of this annex.
2/ Where a Party judges that other systems or techniques with a demonstrably equivalent efficiency can be used for manure storage and animal housing in order to comply with paragraphs 8 and 10, or where a Party judges the reduction of emissions from manure storage required under paragraph 9 not to be technically or economically feasible, documentation to this effect shall be reported in accordance with article 7, paragraph 1 (a).