|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant
|
Signature
|
Approval(AA), Acceptance(A), Accession(a), Succession(d), Ratification
|
Afghanistan
|
20 Feb 2004
|
25 Aug 2008
|
Albania
|
18 Dec 2003
|
25 May 2006
|
Algeria
|
9 Dec 2003
|
25 Aug 2004
|
Angola
|
10 Dec 2003
|
29 Aug 2006
|
Antigua and Barbuda
|
|
21 Jun 2006 a
|
Argentina
|
10 Dec 2003
|
28 Aug 2006
|
Armenia
|
19 May 2005
|
8 Mar 2007
|
Australia
|
9 Dec 2003
|
7 Dec 2005
|
Austria
|
10 Dec 2003
|
11 Jan 2006
|
Azerbaijan
|
27 Feb 2004
|
1 Nov 2005
|
Bahamas
|
|
10 Jan 2008 a
|
Bahrain
|
8 Feb 2005
|
|
Bangladesh
|
|
27 Feb 2007 a
|
Barbados
|
10 Dec 2003
|
|
Belarus
|
28 Apr 2004
|
17 Feb 2005
|
Belgium
|
10 Dec 2003
|
25 Sep 2008
|
Benin
|
10 Dec 2003
|
14 Oct 2004
|
Bhutan
|
15 Sep 2005
|
|
Bolivia
|
9 Dec 2003
|
5 Dec 2005
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
16 Sep 2005
|
26 Oct 2006
|
Brazil
|
9 Dec 2003
|
15 Jun 2005
|
Brunei Darussalam
|
11 Dec 2003
|
2 Dec 2008
|
Bulgaria
|
10 Dec 2003
|
20 Sep 2006
|
Burkina Faso
|
10 Dec 2003
|
10 Oct 2006
|
Burundi
|
|
10 Mar 2006 a
|
Cambodia
|
|
5 Sep 2007 a
|
Cameroon
|
10 Dec 2003
|
6 Feb 2006
|
Canada
|
21 May 2004
|
2 Oct 2007
|
Cape Verde
|
9 Dec 2003
|
23 Apr 2008
|
Central African Republic
|
11 Feb 2004
|
6 Oct 2006
|
Chile
|
11 Dec 2003
|
13 Sep 2006
|
China 1
|
10 Dec 2003
|
13 Jan 2006
|
Colombia
|
10 Dec 2003
|
27 Oct 2006
|
Comoros
|
10 Dec 2003
|
|
Congo
|
|
13 Jul 2006 a
|
Costa Rica
|
10 Dec 2003
|
21 Mar 2007
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
10 Dec 2003
|
|
Croatia
|
10 Dec 2003
|
24 Apr 2005
|
Cuba
|
9 Dec 2005
|
9 Feb 2007
|
Cyprus
|
9 Dec 2003
|
23 Feb 2009
|
Czech Republic
|
22 Apr 2005
|
|
Denmark 2
|
10 Dec 2003
|
26 Dec 2006
|
Djibouti
|
17 Jun 2004
|
20 Apr 2005
|
Dominican Republic
|
10 Dec 2003
|
26 Oct 2006
|
Ecuador
|
10 Dec 2003
|
15 Sep 2005
|
Egypt
|
9 Dec 2003
|
25 Feb 2005
|
El Salvador
|
10 Dec 2003
|
1 Jul 2004
|
Ethiopia
|
10 Dec 2003
|
26 Nov 2007
|
European Community
|
15 Sep 2005
|
12 Nov 2008 AA
|
Fiji
|
|
14 May 2008 a
|
Finland
|
9 Dec 2003
|
20 Jun 2006 A
|
France
|
9 Dec 2003
|
11 Jul 2005
|
Gabon
|
10 Dec 2003
|
1 Oct 2007
|
Georgia
|
|
4 Nov 2008 a
|
Germany
|
9 Dec 2003
|
|
Ghana
|
9 Dec 2004
|
27 Jun 2007
|
Greece
|
10 Dec 2003
|
17 Sep 2008
|
Guatemala
|
9 Dec 2003
|
3 Nov 2006
|
Guinea
|
15 Jul 2005
|
|
Guinea-Bissau
|
|
10 Sep 2007 a
|
Guyana
|
|
16 Apr 2008 a
|
Haiti
|
10 Dec 2003
|
14 Sep 2009
|
Honduras
|
17 May 2004
|
23 May 2005
|
Hungary
|
10 Dec 2003
|
19 Apr 2005
|
India
|
9 Dec 2005
|
|
Indonesia
|
18 Dec 2003
|
19 Sep 2006
|
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
|
9 Dec 2003
|
20 Apr 2009
|
Iraq
|
|
17 Mar 2008 a
|
Ireland
|
9 Dec 2003
|
|
Israel
|
29 Nov 2005
|
4 Feb 2009
|
Italy
|
9 Dec 2003
|
5 Oct 2009
|
Jamaica
|
16 Sep 2005
|
5 Mar 2008
|
Japan
|
9 Dec 2003
|
|
Jordan
|
9 Dec 2003
|
24 Feb 2005
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
18 Jun 2008 a
|
Kenya 3
|
9 Dec 2003
|
9 Dec 2003
|
Kuwait
|
9 Dec 2003
|
16 Feb 2007
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
10 Dec 2003
|
16 Sep 2005
|
Lao People's Democratic Republic
|
10 Dec 2003
|
25 Sep 2009
|
Latvia
|
19 May 2005
|
4 Jan 2006
|
Lebanon
|
|
22 Apr 2009 a
|
Lesotho
|
16 Sep 2005
|
16 Sep 2005
|
Liberia
|
|
16 Sep 2005 a
|
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
|
23 Dec 2003
|
7 Jun 2005
|
Liechtenstein
|
10 Dec 2003
|
|
Lithuania
|
10 Dec 2003
|
21 Dec 2006
|
Luxembourg
|
10 Dec 2003
|
6 Nov 2007
|
Madagascar
|
10 Dec 2003
|
22 Sep 2004
|
Malawi
|
21 Sep 2004
|
4 Dec 2007
|
Malaysia
|
9 Dec 2003
|
24 Sep 2008
|
Maldives
|
|
22 Mar 2007 a
|
Mali
|
9 Dec 2003
|
18 Apr 2008
|
Malta
|
12 May 2005
|
11 Apr 2008
|
Mauritania
|
|
25 Oct 2006 a
|
Mauritius
|
9 Dec 2003
|
15 Dec 2004
|
Mexico
|
9 Dec 2003
|
20 Jul 2004
|
Mongolia
|
29 Apr 2005
|
11 Jan 2006
|
Montenegro 4
|
|
23 Oct 2006 d
|
Morocco
|
9 Dec 2003
|
9 May 2007
|
Mozambique 5
|
25 May 2004
|
9 Apr 2008
|
Myanmar
|
2 Dec 2005
|
|
Namibia
|
9 Dec 2003
|
3 Aug 2004
|
Nepal
|
10 Dec 2003
|
|
Netherlands 6
|
10 Dec 2003
|
31 Oct 2006 A
|
New Zealand
|
10 Dec 2003
|
|
Nicaragua
|
10 Dec 2003
|
15 Feb 2006
|
Niger
|
|
11 Aug 2008 a
|
Nigeria
|
9 Dec 2003
|
14 Dec 2004
|
Norway
|
9 Dec 2003
|
29 Jun 2006
|
Pakistan
|
9 Dec 2003
|
31 Aug 2007
|
Palau
|
|
24 Mar 2009 a
|
Panama
|
10 Dec 2003
|
23 Sep 2005
|
Papua New Guinea
|
22 Dec 2004
|
16 Jul 2007
|
Paraguay
|
9 Dec 2003
|
1 Jun 2005
|
Peru
|
10 Dec 2003
|
16 Nov 2004
|
Philippines
|
9 Dec 2003
|
8 Nov 2006
|
Poland
|
10 Dec 2003
|
15 Sep 2006
|
Portugal
|
11 Dec 2003
|
28 Sep 2007
|
Qatar
|
1 Dec 2005
|
30 Jan 2007
|
Republic of Korea
|
10 Dec 2003
|
27 Mar 2008
|
Republic of Moldova
|
28 Sep 2004
|
1 Oct 2007
|
Romania
|
9 Dec 2003
|
2 Nov 2004
|
Russian Federation
|
9 Dec 2003
|
9 May 2006
|
Rwanda
|
30 Nov 2004
|
4 Oct 2006
|
Sao Tome and Principe
|
8 Dec 2005
|
12 Apr 2006
|
Saudi Arabia
|
9 Jan 2004
|
|
Senegal
|
9 Dec 2003
|
16 Nov 2005
|
Serbia
|
11 Dec 2003
|
20 Dec 2005
|
Seychelles
|
27 Feb 2004
|
16 Mar 2006
|
Sierra Leone
|
9 Dec 2003
|
30 Sep 2004
|
Singapore
|
11 Nov 2005
|
6 Nov 2009
|
Slovakia
|
9 Dec 2003
|
1 Jun 2006
|
Slovenia
|
|
1 Apr 2008 a
|
South Africa
|
9 Dec 2003
|
22 Nov 2004
|
Spain
|
16 Sep 2005
|
19 Jun 2006
|
Sri Lanka
|
15 Mar 2004
|
31 Mar 2004
|
Sudan
|
14 Jan 2005
|
|
Swaziland
|
15 Sep 2005
|
|
Sweden
|
9 Dec 2003
|
25 Sep 2007
|
Switzerland
|
10 Dec 2003
|
24 Sep 2009
|
Syrian Arab Republic
|
9 Dec 2003
|
|
Tajikistan
|
|
25 Sep 2006 a
|
Thailand
|
9 Dec 2003
|
|
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
|
18 Aug 2005
|
13 Apr 2007
|
Timor-Leste
|
10 Dec 2003
|
27 Mar 2009
|
Togo
|
10 Dec 2003
|
6 Jul 2005
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
11 Dec 2003
|
31 May 2006
|
Tunisia
|
30 Mar 2004
|
23 Sep 2008
|
Turkey
|
10 Dec 2003
|
9 Nov 2006
|
Turkmenistan
|
|
28 Mar 2005 a
|
Uganda
|
9 Dec 2003
|
9 Sep 2004
|
Ukraine
|
11 Dec 2003
|
|
United Arab Emirates
|
10 Aug 2005
|
22 Feb 2006
|
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 7
|
9 Dec 2003
|
9 Feb 2006
|
United Republic of Tanzania
|
9 Dec 2003
|
25 May 2005
|
United States of America
|
9 Dec 2003
|
30 Oct 2006
|
Uruguay
|
9 Dec 2003
|
10 Jan 2007
|
Uzbekistan
|
|
29 Jul 2008 a
|
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
|
10 Dec 2003
|
2 Feb 2009
|
Viet Nam
|
10 Dec 2003
|
19 Aug 2009
|
Yemen
|
11 Dec 2003
|
7 Nov 2005
|
Zambia
|
11 Dec 2003
|
7 Dec 2007
|
Zimbabwe
|
20 Feb 2004
|
8 Mar 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Close Declaration
|
Declarations and Reservations
(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations and reservations were made upon ratification,acceptance, approval or accession.)
|
Algeria8 Reservation and declaration:
Reservation:
The Government of the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 66, paragraph 2 of this Convention, which provides that any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention that cannot be settled through negotiation shall, at the request of one of those States Parties, be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice. The Government of the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria considers that no dispute of such nature may be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice without the consent of all the parties to the dispute. Declaration:
The ratification of this Convention by the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria does not in any way signify recognition of Israel. The present ratification may not be interpreted as leading to the establishment of relations of any kind with Israel.
|
|
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan Declarations:
"The Republic of Azerbaijan declares that it will be unable to guarantee compliance with the provisions of this Convention in its territories occupied by the Republic of Armenia until these territories are liberated from that occupation. The Republic of Azerbaijan declares that none of the rights, obligations and provisions set out in the Convention shall be applied by the Republic of Azerbaijan in respect of the Republic of Armenia. Reservation:
In accordance with paragraph 3 of Article 66 of the Convention, the Republic of Azerbaijan declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of Article 66."
|
|
Bahamas
Bahamas Reservation: “Pursuant to Article 66, paragraph 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, the Government of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 66, paragraph 2 of the Convention. The Government of the Bahamas asserts that the consent of all parties to such a dispute is necessary, in each individual case, before the dispute is submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice.”
|
|
Bangladesh
Bangladesh Reservation:
"Pursuant to Article 66, paragraph 3 of the Convention, People's Republic of Bangladesh does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 66, paragraph 2 of the Convention."
|
|
Belgium
Belgium Reservation: The Belgian Government entered the following reservation concerning the implementation of article 29 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, done in New York on 31 October 2003 at the time of the deposit of its instrument of ratification, the text of which reads as follows:
“In accordance with articles 21 and 22 of the preliminary part of the Belgian Code of Criminal Procedure, the fact that an alleged perpetrator of an offence established in accordance with this Convention has evaded the administration of justice shall not extend or suspend the statute of limitations period in which to commence proceedings.”
|
|
Brunei Darussalam
Brunei Darussalam Reservation:
« Brunei Darussalam does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 66 and therefore take the position that disputes relating to the interpretation or application of the Convention which cannot be settled through the channel provided for in paragraph 2 of the said Article may be referred to the International Court of Justice only with the consent of the parties to the dispute.”
|
|
Canada
Canada Declarations:
"1. Article 14 (1) (b): Article 14 (1) (b) provides that the obligation of a State Party to exchange financial intelligence shall be ‘within the conditions prescribed by its domestic law.' Given that Canadian law only permits the exchange of information between Financial Intelligence Units through bilateral agreements or arrangements, Canada will provide for exchange of the information referred to in this article only pursuant to such a bilateral agreement or arrangement.
2. Article 17: It is the understanding of the Government of Canada that in relation to Article 17 the word ‘diversion' means embezzlement and misappropriation, which constitute the criminal offences of theft and fraud under current Canadian law.
3. Article 20: Article 20 provides that the obligation of a State Party to criminalize illicit enrichment shall be ‘subject to its constitution and the fundamental principles of its legal system.' An offence of illicit enrichment is incompatible with the Constitution of Canada, more specifically with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the fundamental principles of the Canadian legal system. Canada will therefor not create the offence of illicit enrichment.
4. Article 42 (2): Article 42 (2) provides that a State Party ‘may' establish jurisdiction based on nationality. Given that Canada has effective and broad territorial jurisdiction over corruption offences, Canada does not intend to extend its jurisdiction in the case of an offence committed by a Canadian national beyond that existing territorial basis of jurisdiction.
5. Article 52: Canada already imposes strict requirements on financial institutions within its jurisdiction to closely scrutinize foreign persons with prominent public functions and theirfamily members and close associates. It is the understanding of the Government of Canada that these current requirements satisfy Article 52, particularly in light of the negotiations of the State Paich led to the creation and inclusion of Article 52 in the Convention. Canada is in the process of undergoing consultations with a view to implementing legislative changes that would broaden this existing due diligence beyond the obligations contained in the Convention and expand the category of persons covered and the financial institutions in whom they apply. Canada will inform the Depository of the outcome of these discussions.
6. Article 54: Canada will provide international assistance for the freezing, seizure and forfeiture of proceeds of crime and offence-related property only when the request is accompanied by an order from a court of criminal jurisdiction in the requesting country. In the case where international assistance is required for the forfeiture of this property, Canada will provide assistance only when the request is accompanied by a final order from such a court."
|
|
China
China Reservation:
.....the People's Republic of China shall not be bound by paragraph 2 of Article 66 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption.
|
|
Colombia
Colombia Reservation:
In accordance with article 66, paragraph 3, of the Convention, Colombia declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of that article.
|
|
Cuba
Cuba Reservation:
The Republic of Cuba declares that, pursuant to article 66, paragraph 3, of the Convention, it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 2 of this article, which deals with the settlement of disputes arising between States parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention and referral of such disputes to the International Court of Justice, because it believes that such disputes should be resolved through amicable negotiations between the States parties.
|
|
El Salvador
El Salvador Declaration and notifications:
(a) With respect to the provisions of article 44, the Republic of El Salvador does not regard the above-mentioned Convention as the legal basis for cooperation in connection with extradition; (b) With respect to article 46, paragraphs 13 and 14, the Republic of El Salvador states that the central authority as regards El Salvador is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and that the acceptable language is Spanish; ...
Declaration:
... ... (c) With respect to article 66, the Government of the Republic of El Salvador states that, by virtue of the provisions of paragraph 3 of that article, it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 2 as it does not recognize the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. The foregoing applies exclusively to the context of the process for the settlement of disputes set forth in the said article.
|
|
Ethiopia
Ethiopia Reservation:
“… ratification by Ethiopia of the said Convention with a reservation on Article 44 of the Convention.”
|
|
European Community
European Community Declarations:
“Declaration concerning the competence of the European Community with regard to matters governed by the United Nations Convention against Corruption Article 67, paragraph 3, of the United Nations Convention against Corruption provides that the instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval of a regional economic integration organisation shall contain a declaration on the extent of its competence. 1. The Community notes that, for the purposes of the Convention, the term ‘States Parties’ applies to regional economic integration organisations within the limits of their competence. To the extent that provisions of Community law are affected by the provisions of the Convention, the European Community has an exclusive competence to accept such obligations with respect to its own public administration. In this regard, the Community declares that it has power under the Treaty establishing the European Community to deal with the following issues:
- developing, implementing and maintening preventive anti-corruption policies and practices, - establishing a preventive anti-corruption body or bodies (including the European Anti-Fraud Office) and providing the means for the public to inform such body or bodies of incidents which may constitute corruption, - regulating the recruitment, conditions of service, remuneration, training, etc. of non-elected officials under the Staff Regulations and the implementing rules to those Regulations, - promoting transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest in the design of the European Community’s systems which regulate the performance of the duties of public officials, - developing and implementing codes of conduct, - ensuring appropriate standards in relation to public procurement and the managementof public finances, - enhancing the transparency of the European Community’s organisation, functioning and decisionmaking processes, - with due regard to the independence of judicial bodies of the European Communities, developing, implementing and maintening measures to strengthen the integrity of those bodies and to prevent opportunities for corruption. 2. The Community also points out that it has competence with regard to the proper functioning of the internal market, comprising an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, capital and services is ensured in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Community. For this purpose, the Community has adopted measures to:
- ensure transparency and the equal access of all candidates for public contracts and markets of Community relevance, thereby contributing to preventing corruption, - ensure appropriate standards on accounting and auditing of Community relevance, - prevent money laundering; such measures do not, however, include those concerning cooperation among judicial and law enforcement authorities. Where it has adopted measures, it is for the Community alone to enter into external undertakings with third States or competent international organisations which affect those measures or alter their scope. 3. Community policy in the sphere of development cooperation as well as cooperation with other third countries complements policies pursued by Member States to support partner countries in the implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption and includes provisions to combat corruption. 4. The scope and exercise of Community competence are, by their nature, subject to continuous development and the Community will complete or amend this declaration, if necessary, in accordance with Article 67 (3) of the Convention. 5. The United Nations Convention against Corruption shall apply, with regard to the competence of the Community, to the territories in which the Treaty establishing the European Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty, in particular Article 299 thereof. Pursuant to Article 299 of that Treaty, this declaration is not applicable to the territories of the Member States in which the said Treaty does not apply and is without prejudice to such acts or positions as may be adopted under the Convention by the Member States concerned on behalf of, and in the interests of, those territories." "Declaration With respect to Article 66, paragraph 2, the Community points out that, according to Article 34, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, only States may be parties before that Court. Therefore, under Article 66, paragraph 2, of the Convention, in disputes involving the Community, only dispute settlement by way of arbitration will be available." The action will become effective for European Community on 12 December 2008 in accordance with its article 68 (2) which reads as follows:
"For each State or regional economic integration organization ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to this Convention after the deposit of the thirtieth instrument of such action, this Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the date of deposit by such State or organization of the relevant instrument or on the date this Convention enters into force pursuant to paragraph 1 of this article, whichever is later."
|
|
Georgia
Georgia Reservation:
“In accordance with article 66, paragraph 3, Georgia excludes the arbitration proceedings provided for in article 66, paragraph 2.”
|
|
Indonesia
Indonesia Reservation:
"The Government of the Republic of Indonesia does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 66, paragraph 2 and takes the position that disputes relating to the interpretation or application of the Convention which can not be settled through the channel provided for in paragraph 2 of the said article may be referred to the International Court of Justice only with consent of the parties to the disputes."
|
|
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Iran (Islamic Republic of) Reservation made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:
"Pursuant to article 66, paragraph 3 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 66, paragraph 2 of the Convention. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran affirms that the consent of all parties to such a dispute is necessary, in each individual case, for the submission of the dispute to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran can, if it deems appropriate, for the settlement of such a dispute, agree with the submission of the dispute to arbitration in accordance with its Constitution and related domestic law. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran reserves its right to declare further reservation(s), at it deems appropriate, at the time of the deposit of the instrument of ratification of the Convention." Interpretative declaration made upon ratification:
“The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran regards the ‘laundering of proceeds of crime’ in Article 23 of the Convention as relating exclusively to the offences stipulated in the Convention.”
|
|
Israel
Israel Reservation made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:
"Pursuant to article 66, paragraph 3 of the Convention, the Government of the State of Israel declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 66, paragraph 2 of the Convention."
|
|
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan Reservation:
In accordance with article 66, paragraph 3 of the Convention, the Republic of Kazakhstan does not consider itself bound by article 66, paragraph 2 of the Convention.
|
|
Kuwait
Kuwait Reservation:
... subject to a reservation concerning the mandatory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in cases of arbitration or the referral of disputes stipulated in article 66, paragraph 2.
|
|
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Lao People's Democratic Republic Reservation:
“In accordance with paragraph 3, Article 66 of the Convention against Corruption, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2, Article 66 of the present Convention. The Lao People’s Democratic Republic declares further that to refer a dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the present Convention to International Arbitration or to refer it to the International Court of Justice for decision requires the consent of all parties thereto.”
|
|
Malaysia
Malaysia Reservations:
“(a) Pursuant to Article 66, paragraph 3 of the Convention, the Government of Malaysia declares that it does not consider itself bound by Article 66, paragraph 2 of the Convention; and (b) The Government of Malaysia reserves the right specifically to agree in a particular case to follow the arbitration procedure set forth in Article 66, paragraph 2 of the Convention or any other procedure for arbitration.”
|
|
Malta
Malta Reservation:
"Pursuant to Article 66, the Government of Malta declares that it shall not be bound by the provisions of paragraph 2 of article 66 of this Convention."
|
|
Myanmar
Myanmar Upon signature:
Reservation:
"With regard to any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the Union of Myanmar does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of article 66 of the Convention."
|
|
Pakistan
Pakistan Reservation:
“The Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan declares that, pursuant to Article 66, Paragraph 3 of the Convention, it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article."
|
|
Panama
Panama Declaration :
... the Republic of Panama does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of [article 66] which reads as follows:
"2. Any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention that cannot be settled through negotiation within a reasonable time shall, at the request of one of those States Parties, be submitted to arbitration. If, six months after the date of the request for arbitration, those States Parties are unable to agree on the organization of the arbitration, any one of those States Parties may refer the dispute to the International Court of Justice by request in accordance with the Statute of the Court."
|
|
Paraguay
Paraguay Reservation:
The Republic of Paraguay makes the following reservation in relation to the term "offence" as defined in the United Nations Convention against Corruption:
For the application of the Convention, the meaning of the term "offence" shall be understood to be "punishable act", in accordance with current domestic legislation.
|
|
Qatar
Qatar Reservation made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:
... with reservation on the provisions of paragraph 2 of article 66 of the Convention, concerning arbitration and referring the dispute to the International Court of Justice, under the name of the State of Qatar.
|
|
Russian Federation
Russian Federation Declarations:
1) The Russian Federation possesses jurisdiction over the acts recognized as criminal pursuant to article 15; article 16, paragraph 1; articles 17 to 19, 21 and 22; article 23, paragraph 1; and articles 24, 25 and 27 of the Convention in the cases covered by article 42, paragraphs 1 and 3 of the Convention; ... 3) The Russian Federation believes that article 44, paragraph 15 of the Convention must be interpreted in such a way as to make accountability for offences falling within the purview of this Convention inescapable, without prejudice to the effectiveness of international cooperation on extradition and legal assistance; ... 4) The Russian Federation declares, on the basis of article 46, paragraph 7, of the Convention, that it will apply article 46, paragraphs 9 to 29, of the Convention in lieu of the corresponding provisions of treaties of mutual legal assistance concluded between the Russian Federation and other States Parties to the Convention, on a foundation of reciprocity, if, in the view of the central authority of the Russian Federation, to do so would facilitate cooperation; ... 7) The Russian Federation declares, in accordance with article 48, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that it will consider the Convention to be the basis for mutual cooperation between law enforcement agencies in respect of the offences covered by the Convention, provided that such cooperation does not involve investigations or other procedural activities in the territory of the Russian Federation; 8) The Russian Federation declares, in accordance with article 55, paragraph 6, of the Convention, that it will consider the Convention to be a necessary and sufficient treaty basis for taking the measures referred to in article 55, paragraphs 1 and 2, of the Convention, on a foundation of reciprocity.
|
|
Singapore
Singapore Reservation:
“Pursuant to Article 66, paragraph 3 of the above mentioned Convention, the Government of the Republic of Singapore does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 66, paragraph 2 of the said Convention.”
|
|
South Africa
South Africa Reservation:
"... pending a decision by the Government of the Republic of South Africa on the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, the Government of the Republic does not consider itself bound by the terms of Article 66 (2) of the Convention which provides for the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in differences arising out of the interpretation or application of the Convention. The Republic will adhere to the position that, for the submission of a particular dispute for settlement by the International Court, the consent of all the parties to the dispute is required in every individual case."
|
|
Spain
Spain Declaration made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:
The Kingdom of Spain declares that the expression "special territory" used in article 46, paragraph 13, refers to entities included within the territorial organization of States Parties, but not to dependent territories for whose international relations those States are responsible.
|
|
Tunisia
Tunisia Upon signature:
Reservation:
The Republic of Tunisia declares that, in signing the United?Nations Convention against Corruption, adopted in New York on 31 October 2003, it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 66, paragraph 2, of the Convention and affirms that differences as to the interpretation or application of the said Convention may be submitted to the International Court of Justice only with the prior consent of all the parties concerned.
|
|
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates Reservation:
... subject to a reservation to article 66, paragraph 2, of the Convention regarding arbitration, which it does not consider itself bound by.
|
|
United States of America
United States of America Reservations and declarations:
"Reservations (1) The United States of America reserves the right to assume obligations under the Convention in a manner consistent with its fundamental principles of federalism, pursuant to which both federal and state criminal laws must be considered in relation to the conduct addressed in the Convention. U.S. federal criminal law, which regulates conduct based on its effect on interstate or foreign commerce, or another federal interest, serves as an important component of the legal regime within the United States for combating corruption and is broadly effective for this purpose. Federal criminal law does not apply where such criminal conduct does not so involve interstate or foreign commerce, or another federal interest. There are conceivable situations involving offenses of a purely local character where U.S. federal and state criminal law may not be entirely adequate to satisfy an obligation under the Convention. Similarly, in the U.S. system, the states are responsible for preventive measures governing their own officials. While the states generally regulate their own affairs in a manner consistent with the obligations set forth in the chapter on preventive measures in the Convention, in some cases they may do so in a different manner. Accordingly, there may be situations where state and federal law will not be entirely adequate to satisfy an obligation in Chapters II and III of the Convention. The United States of America therefore reserves to the obligations set forth in the Convention to the extent they (1) address conduct that would fall within this narrow category of highly localized activity or (2) involve preventive measures not covered by federal law governing state and local officials.This reservation does not affect in any respect the ability of the United States to provide international cooperation to other States Parties in accordance with the provisions of the Convention. (2) The United States of America reserves the right not to apply in part the obligation set forth in Article 42, paragraph 1 (b) with respect to the offenses established in accordance with the Convention. The United States does not provide for plenary jurisdiction over offenses that are committed on board ships flying its flag or aircraft registered under its laws. However, in many circumstances, U.S. law provides for jurisdiction over such offenses committed on board U.S. - flagged ships or aircraft registered under U.S. law. Accordingly, the United States shall implement paragraph 1 (b) to the extent provided for under its federal law. Declarations (1) In accordance with Article 66, paragraph 3, the United States of America declares that it does not consider itself bound by the obligations set forth in Article 66, paragraph 2. (2) The United States declares that the provisions of the Convention (with the exception of Articles 44 and 46) are non-self-executing. None of the provisions of the Convention creates a private right of action.
|
|
Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan Declaration:
“… to paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 42 of the Convention: The Republic of Uzbekistan declares that in accordance with the national legislation, offenses described in articles 15-19, 21, 22, paragraph 1 of the article 23, articles 24, 25, 27 are criminal offenses and on them the jurisdiction of the Republic of Uzbekistan shall be applied …”
Reservation:
“… to Article 66 of the Convention: In accordance with paragraph 3 of the article 66 of the Convention the Republic of Uzbekistan declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 2 of article 66 of the Convention.”
|
|
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Upon Ratification
Reservation:
The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, in accordance with article 66, paragraph 3, of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, hereby makes an express reservation concerning the provisions of paragraph 2 of that article. Consequently, it does not consider itself obliged to resort to arbitration as a means of dispute settlement, nor does it recognize the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.” Declaration:
The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela also declares that:
Concerning the provisions of article 44, paragraph 11, the extradition of nationals is expressly prohibited under Venezuelan law. In that regard, Venezuela undertakes, at the request of the State party seeking extradition, to submit the case without undue delay to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution.
|
|
Viet Nam
Viet Nam Reservation made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:
"The Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 66, paragraph 2, of this Convention." Declarations:
“1. Pursuant to principles of the Vietnamese law, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions with regard to the criminalization of illicit enrichment set forth in Article 20 and the criminal liability of legal persons set forth in Article 26 of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption. 2. The Socialist Republic of Vietnam declares that the provisions of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption are non-self-executing; the implementation of provisions set forth in the Convention shall be in accordance with Constitutional principles and substantive law of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, on the basis of bilateral or multilateral cooperative agreements with other States Parties and the principle of reciprocity.”
|
|
Yemen
Yemen Reservation:
.....subject to our reservation concerning article 44 and article 66, paragraph 2, of the Convention.
|
|
(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations and reservations were made
upon ratification,acceptance, approval or accession.)
|
|
Netherlands
Netherlands 6 December 2007
Ojection to the reservations made by the United States of America upon ratification:
“The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands has carefully examined the reservations made by the United States of America to the United Nations Convention against Corruption. The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands considers that reservations which consist of a reference to the federal structure of a State or to its national legislation leave it uncertain to which extent that State accepts to be bound by the obligations under the treaty. It is in the common interest of States that treaties which they decide to ratify or accede to be fully complied with by all parties and that States be prepared to adapt their national legislation to their obligations under such treaties. Reservations such as the ones made by the United States, which declare that obligations under the Convention will be assumed to the extent consistent with its fundamental principles of federalism or national law, undermine the basis of the international law of treaties. The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands therefore objects to these reservations. It is the understanding of the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands that the reservations of the United States of America do not exclude or modify the legal effect of provisions of the Convention in their application to the United States. This objection does not constitute an obstacle to the entry into force of the Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United States.”
|
|
|
|
|
Viet Nam
Viet Nam “In accordance with Article 44 of the Convention thereof, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam declares that it shall not take the Convention as the legal basis for extraditions. The Socialist Republic of Vietnam shall conduct extradition in accordance with the Vietnamese law, on the basis of treaties on extradition and the principle of reciprocity.”
|
|
Notifications made under article 6 (3), 44 (6)(a) and 46 (13) and (14)
(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations and reservations were made upon ratification,
acceptance, approval or accession.)
|
AlbaniaAlbania "Pursuant to article 6, paragraph 3, of the above mentioned Convention, the Department of the Internal Audit and Anti-Corruption is the competent authority of the Government of the Republic of Albania. Address: Department of the Internal Audit and Anti-Corruption Council of Ministers Blv. "Deshmoret e Kombit" Tirana, Albania Pursuant to Article 44, paragraph 6, subparagraph a, the Republic of Albania regards this Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other state parties to this Convention. Pursuant to Article 46, paragraph 13, of the Convention, the central authorities that shall have the responsibility and power to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution, are: 1. The General Prosecutor Office, which shall have the responsibility for criminal investigations and proceedings, Address: Office of the General Attorney Rr. Qemal Stafa, Nr. 1 Tirana, Albania 2. The Ministry of Justice, which shall have the responsibility for the requests during the trial process and the execution of verdicts, as well as the requests for extradition and transfer of the convicted persons. Address: Ministry of Justice Blv: "Zogu I" Tirana, Albania Pursuant to article 46, paragraph 14 of the Convention, the Albanian language is the acceptable language for the Republic of Albania, and if it is not possible, a certified translation in the Albanian language will be the acceptable one."
|
AlgeriaAlgeria 12 March 2008 ... Article 46, paragraphs 13 and 14, the Algerian Party designates: – The Ministry of Justice (Department of Penal Affairs and Clemency Proceedings) as the central authority that shall have the power to receive requests for mutual legal assistance; – Arabic as the acceptable language in which requests for mutual legal assistance shall be made. However, such requests may be accompanied by a certified translation in the French language.
|
ArgentinaArgentina 17 July 2007 The following central authority is designated by Argentina in accordance with article 46 (13) of the Convention: International Legal Assistance Directorate Directorate General for Legal Affairs Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Worship Esmeralda 1212, Piso 4? (C.P. 1007) Ciudad de Buenos Aires, República Argentina Tel./Fax: (54-11) 4819-7170/7172/7231 e-mail: diaju@mrecic.gov.ar
|
AzerbaijanAzerbaijan In accordance with sub paragraph "a" of paragraph 6 of Article 44 of the Convention, the Republic of Azerbaijan declares that it will use the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to the Convention. In accordance with paragraph 13 of Article 46 of the Convention, the Republic of Azerbaijan declares that it designates the Prosecutors' Office of the Republic of Azerbaijan as the central authority responsible for receiving requests or for implementation of mutual legal assistance. Address: Nigar Rafibeyli st, 7, AZ1001, Baky, Azerbaijan. In accordance with paragraph 14 of Article 46 of the Convention, the Republic of Azerbaijan declares that the requests and supporting documents on legal assistance should be submitted in Russian or English as the UN official languages and should be accompanied by a translation in Azerbaijani language.
|
BangladeshBangladesh 31 October 2007 “Article 6 (3): The contact details of the authorities that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption are as follows: Secretary Ministry of Foreign Affairs Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Segunbagicha, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh Secretary Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary of Bangladesh Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh Secretary Anti Corruption Commission (ACC) Segunbagicha, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh Article 46 (13): The contact details of the central authority designated to receive requests for mutual legal assistance are: Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh Article 46 (14): The acceptable language for requests for mutual legal assistance is English.
10 March 2008 Notification under article 46(13): “Attorney General Attorney General’s Office Bangladesh Supreme Court Building (New Building, 8th floor) Dhaka, Bangladesh”
28 April 2008 Notification under article 6(3): “… in addition to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and the Anti-Corruption Commission, the Attorney General’s Office has also been designated by the Government of Bangladesh as the “authority” that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption pursuant to article 6 (3) of the ‘United Nations Convention against Corruption’. The particulars of the Attorney General’s Office are as follows: Attorney General Attorney General’s Office Bangladesh Supreme Court Building (New Building, 8th floor) Bangladesh”
|
BelarusBelarus "... Pursuant to the Article 44, paragraph 6 of the Convention, the Republic of Belarus regards the Convention as a legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to the Convention".
|
BelgiumBelgium Article 6, paragraph 3: prevention Service Public Fédéral Budget et Contrôle de la gestion (Federal Public Service of Budget and Management Control) Bureau d’éthique et de déontologie administratives (Office of Administrative Ethics and Professional Conduct) Politique d’intégrité (Integrity Policy) Rue Royale 138/2 1000 Brussels Mr. Peter DE ROECK, General Adviser Tel. No.: 02-212-39-04 Fax No.: 02-212-39-33 E-mail: peter.deroeck@budget.fed.be Article 44, paragraph 6 (a): Belgium believes that the Convention can provide an independent basis for extradition where no (bilateral or multilateral) treaty basis for extradition exists. Article 46, paragraph 13: Service Public Fédéral Justice (Federal Public Justice Service) Autorité centrale de coopération internationale en matière pénale (Central Authority for International Cooperation in Criminal Matters) Postal address: Boulevard de Waterloo 115 1000 Brussels Fax No.: 32-2-210-57-98 Fax No.: 32-2-210-56-84 22 January 2009 Belgium accepts requests for mutual legal assistance in the following languages : French, Dutch and English.
|
BeninBenin 3 April 2006 The Permanent Mission of the Republic of Benin to the United Nations in New York presents its compliments to the United Nations Secretariat (Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section) and has the honour to transmit to it the contact information of the central authority designated by Benin in accordance with the provisions of article 46, paragraph 13, of the United Nations Convention against Corruption. This function shall be carried out by the Directorate of Civil and Criminal Affairs of the Ministry of Justice, Legislation and Human Rights, whose contact information is as follows: B.P. 967 Cotonou Tel.: (229) 21 31 31 46 (229) 21 31 31 47 (229) 21 31 51 45 (229) 21 31 56 57 (229) 21 31 56 51 Fax: (229) 21 31 34 48 E-mail: mildh@intnet.bj Office hours: 8 a.m. to 6.30 p.m. (Lunch break 12.30 to 3.00) (Local time is one hour ahead of Greenwich Mean Time.) Pursuant to the provisions of article 46, paragraph 14, of the same Convention, the working language of Benin is French.
|
BoliviaBolivia The Republic of Bolivia, in accordance with paragraph 3 of article 6, hereby gives notification that its Central Authority is the Delegaci6n Presidencial para la Transparencia y la Integndad Publica, whose address is the following: Calle Batallon Colorados Nro. 24 Edificio El Cóndor, piso 11 Tel/fax (+)591-2-2153085 Website: http://www.transparencia-integndad.gov.bo/ Email: dptip@transparencia-integridad.gov.bo La Paz, Bolivia Moreover, accordingly with paragraph 6.(a) of Article 44, notice is given that the legal basis for extradition is that of existing extradition treaties with other countries. With respect to article 46, paragraphs 13 and 14, also states that the central authority that has the responsibility and power to receive written requests for mutual legal assistance is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship; and that the acceptable language is Spanish.
|
Brunei DarussalamBrunei Darussalam 3 December 2008 “1. With reference to paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Convention, Brunei Darussalam hereby notifies that the authorities are : Attorney General Attorney General’s Chambers Law Building Jalan Tutong Bandar Seri Begawan BA 1910 Brunei Darussalam And Director Anti-Corruption Bureau Old Airport Road Berakas, BB 3510 Brunei Darussalam 2. With reference to paragraph 13 of Article 46 of the Convention the Attorney General is designated as the Central Authority for the matters pertaining to mutual legal assistance under this Convention, whose address is: Attorney General’s Chambers Law Building Jalan Tutong Bandar Seri Begawan BA 1910 BRUNEI DARUSSALAM 3. With reference to paragraph 14 of Article 46 of the Convention, Brunei Darussalam hereby notifies that requests for mutual legal assistance under the Convention should be made in, or accompanied by a translation into the English language.”
|
BulgariaBulgaria Declaration under article 46, paragraph 13 "In accordance with Article 46, paragraph 13, of the Convention, the Republic of Bulgaria declares that the requests for mutual legal assistance must be addressed to the Minister of Justice." Declaration under article 46, paragraph 14 "In accordance with Article 46, paragraph 14, of the Convention, the Republic of Bulgaria declares that the requests for mutual legal assistance must be accompanied by a translation into Bulgarian or English language."
|
CameroonCameroon 25 November 2008 In accordance with article 46(13) of the Convention …, has the honour to inform you that the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Cameroon is the central authority which has the responsibility and power to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution.
|
CanadaCanada "1. Article 6 (3): Each State Party shall inform the UN Secretary-General of the name and address of the authorities that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption. For the purposes of Article 6 (3), the Government of Canada designates the Senior Coordinator for International Crime and Terrorism at the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade of Canada. Address: 125 Sussex Drive Ottawa, ON KIA 002 Phone: (613) 944-2906. 2. Article 44 (6): For the purposes of Article 44 (6), Canada recognizes the Convention as an extradition agreement sufficient to establish the legal basis for extradition under domestic Canadian law. 3. Article 46 (13): For the purposes of Article 46 (13), Canada designates the International Assistance Group of the Department of Justice of Canada as the central authority for all requests for mutual legal assistance under the Convention. Address: 284 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON. KIA 0H8 Phone: (613) 957-4832 4. Article 46 (14): For the purposes of Article 46 (14), Canada accepts English or French as the languages to be used in all requests for mutual legal assistance that Canada receives under the Convention."
|
ChileChile The Government of the Republic of Chile, in accordance with the provisions of article 44, paragraph 6 (a), of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, hereby states that it takes the said Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties to the Convention. In addition, in accordance with the provisions of article 46, paragraph 13, it designates the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with main address at 180 Calle Teatinos, Santiago, Chile, as the central authority for the purpose of receiving requests for mutual legal assistance. It further states that the language acceptable for such requests shall be Spanish.
|
ChinaChina In accordance with the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Convention, the authority for the People's Republic of China to assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention and corruption is the National Bureau of Corruption Prevention of the People’s Republic of China (Address: General Office of the National Bureau of Corruption Prevention of the People's Republic of China, Jia 2 Guanganmen Nanjie, Xuanwu District, Beijing, China, 100053), while the address of the Independent Commission against Corruption of Hong Kong (SAR), the authority for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China to assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Convention, is “c/o ICAC Report Centre, 10/F 303 Java Road, North Point, Hong Kong, China”, and for the Macao Special Administrative Region, such authority is the Commission against Corruption of Macao SAR (Address: Alameda Dr. Carlos d'Assumpçao, Edf. "Dynasty Plaza", 14o Andar-NAPE-Macau). In accordance with the provisions of paragraph 13 of Article 46 of the Convention, the Supreme People's Procuratorate of the People's Republic of China is designated as the central authority which is responsible for receiving requests for mutual legal assistance and other related issues (Address: 147 Beiheyan Dajie, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China, 100726), while for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, such central authority is the Secretary for Justice of the Department of Justice of Hong Kong SAR (47/F High Block, Queensway Government Offices, 66 Queensway, Hong Kong), and for the Macao Special Administrative Region, such central authority is the Office of the Secretary for Administration and Justice of Macao SAR (Address: Sede do Governo da RAEM, Avenida da Praia Grande, Macau). In accordance with the provisions of paragraph 14 of Article 46 of the Convention, Chinese is the only language acceptable to the People's Republic of China for the written requests for mutual legal assistance, while for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, such language is English or Chinese, and for the Macao Special Administrative Region, such language is Chinese or Poruese.
|
ColombiaColombia ... in accordance with article 6, paragraph 3, Colombia hereby reports that the authority that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption is the Presidential Programme for Modernization, Efficiency, Transparency and Combating Corruption: Address: Carrera 8 No. 7-27 Edificio Galán Bogotá, D.C., Colombia Switchboard: 5601095-3341507 E-mail: buzon1@presidencia.gov.co. Moreover, in accordance with article 46, paragraph 13, of the Convention, … the Republic of Colombia has designated the following entities as central authorities with the responsibility and power to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution: The Ministerio del Interior y Justicia, responsible for formulating and receiving requests for assistance and cooperation, as referred to in the Convention. Address: Carrera 9 No. 14-10 Switchboard: 57 (1) 4 44 31 00 E-mail: diana.garcia@mij.gov.co and Asuntos_internacionales@mij.gov.co Bogotá, D.C., ColombiaAddress: Diagonal 22B No. 52-01 Ciudad Salitre Bogotá, D.C., Colombia The Fiscalía General de la Nación, responsible for receiving and executing or transmitting requests for legal assistance formulated by other States parties and formulating requests for legal assistance to other States parties in the case of investigations which it undertakes. Address: Diagonal 22 B No. 52-01 Ciudad Salitre Switchboard: 5702000 - 4144900 E-mail: contacto@fiscalia.gov.co Bogotá, D.C., Colombia Lastly, in accordance with article 46, paragraph 14, of the Convention, Colombia hereby reports that Spanish is the language acceptable to it for requests for legal assistance.
|
Costa RicaCosta Rica 5 July 2007
Notifications made under articles 6 (3), 44 (6), 46 (13) and 46 (14): ... the Republic of Costa Rica, in compliance with article 6 (3) of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, has designated as the authority that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption the Office of the Public Ethics Prosecutor, whose address is Avenidas 2-6, Calle 13, San José, Costa Rica; e-mail: Procuraduria@pgr.go.cr. Similarly, the Republic of Costa Rica wishes to inform ... that the United Nations Convention against Corruption will be taken as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition, in accordance with article 44 (6) of the Convention. Furthermore, the Republic of Costa Rica has the honour to inform ... that the Office of the Public Ethics Prosecutor has been designated the central authority responsible for receiving requests for mutual legal assistance and empowered to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution, in accordance with article 46 (13) of the Convention. Finally, in accordance with article 46 (14) of the Convention, the Republic of Costa Rica wishes to inform ... that the language in which it will receive documents relating to the United Nations Convention against Corruption is Spanish.
|
CroatiaCroatia "The authorities that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption, pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 3 of the Convention, shall be the Office for the Suppression of Corruption and Organised Crime, the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Justice, Pursuant to Article 44, paragraph 6, subparagraph (a) of the Convention, the Republic of Croatia will take this Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to this Convention. The central authority responsible and authorised to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution, pursuant to Article 46, paragraph 13 of the Convention, shall be the Ministry of Justice. Pursuant to Article 46, paragraph 14 of the Convention, the languages acceptable to the Republic of Croatia are Croatian and English."
|
CubaCuba The Republic of Cuba declares that, pursuant to article 44, paragraph 6, of the Convention, it does not take this Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties.
|
CyprusCyprus “[Pursuant to Article 46, paragraph 13], the Ministry of Justice and Public Order is assigned as the Focal Authority of the Republic of Cyprus for the purposes of the said United Nations Convention against Corruption.” 16 April 2009 Notification under article 6(3): “The Permanent Representative of the Republic of Cyprus to the United Nations has the further honour to inform the Secretary-General of the United Nations that the Ministry of Justice and Public Order of the Republic of Cyprus has been designated as the central authority relating to the provision of assistance pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 3 of the Convention. Requests for such assistance may be communicated to the Minister of Justice and Public Order at 125 Athalassas Avenue, Nicosia 1461, Cyprus (tel: +357-22-805-955, fax: +357-22-518356, email: registry@mjpo.gov.cy).” Notification under article 44(6): “Pursuant to Article 44, paragraph 6 (a) of the Convention, the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Cyprus to the United Nations wishes to inform the Secretary-General of the United Nations that the Republic of Cyprus will take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties thereof.” Notification under article 46(14): “Pursuant to Article 46, ….paragraph 14 …..the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Cyprus to the United Nations wishes to inform the Secretary-General of the United Nations that …..requests for mutual legal assistance may be submitted in either Greek, Turkish or English.”
|
DenmarkDenmark Declaration concerning Article 6, paragraph 3, and Article 46, paragraph 13 of the Convention: "In accordance with Article 6 (3) of the Convention, the Government of Denmark has designated the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Asiatisk Plads 2, DK-1448 Copenhagen K, Denmark, the Ministry of Justice, Slotholmsgade 10, DK-1216 Copenhagen K, Denmark, and the Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs, Slotholmsgade 10, KD-1216 Copenhagen K, Denmark, as competent authorities." "In accordance with Article 46 (13) of the Convention, the Government of Denmark has designated to the Ministry of Justice, Slotholmsgade 10, DK-1216 Copenhagen K, Denmark, as competent authority."
|
EcuadorEcuador 23 October 2006 ... the Comisión de Control Cívico de la Corrupción (Commission for Civic Control of Corruption) is the Ecuadorian authority empowered to implement the provisions of article 6, paragraph 3, of the United Nations Convention against Corruption. The head of the Commission is Dr. Ramiro Borja y Borja and the Commission headquarters is located in Quito at the following address: Av. Amazonas 4430 y Villalengua, Edificio Amazonas 100, Piso 3 Telephone: (593-2) 298 36 00 E-mail: comision@control-corrupcion.gov.ec Website: www.comisionanticorrupcion.com
|
El SalvadorEl Salvador (a) With respect to the provisions of article 44, the Republic of El Salvador does not regard the above-mentioned Convention as the legal basis for cooperation in connection with extradition; (b) With respect to article 46, paragraphs 13 and 14, the Republic of El Salvador states that the central authority as regards El Salvador is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and that the acceptable language is Spanish; ...
|
FinlandFinland 28 July 2006 "In Finland the authorities that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption are: The National Council for Crime Prevention Address: PO Box 25, FIN 00023 Government, Finland The Criminal Policy Department of the Ministry of Justice Address: PO Box 25, FIN 00023 Government, Finland The National Bureau of Investigation Address: PO Box 285, 01301 Vantaa, Finland."
|
FranceFrance 27 October 2009 Article 6 (3): … the authority that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption is: Le Service Central de Prévention de la Corruption Ministry of Justice 13 place Vendôme 75042 Paris cedex 01 office: 2-14 rue des Cévennes, 75014 Paris telephone : + 33 1 44 77 71 96 fax: + 33 1 44 77 71 99 emails: michel.barrau@justice.gouv.fr lionel.benaiche@justice.gouv.fr Article 46 (13): … the central authority that shall have the responsibility and power to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution is: La Direction des Affaires Criminelles et des Grâces Ministry of Justice 13 place Vendôme 75042 Paris cedex 01 office: 14 rue Halévy, 75009 Paris telephone: + 33 1 44 86 14 00 fax: + 33 1 44 86 14 11 emails: pierre.bellet@justice.gouv.fr jean-baptiste.bladier@justice.gouv.fr
|
GeorgiaGeorgia “According to article 44, paragraph 6, subparagraph ‘a’, Georgia considers the Convention as the legal basis of collaboration on extradition issues with other state parties based on the principle of reciprocity. According to Article 46, paragraph 13, Georgia designates the Ministry of Justice of Georgia and the Prosecutor General’s Office of Georgia as the central governmental bodies to receive and execute requests for mutual legal assistance. In accordance with article 46, paragraph 14, Georgia will receive the request for the mutual assistance in legal matters in Georgian and English languages.”
|
GreeceGreece “1. The Hellenic Republic declares that, pursuant to article 66 paragraph 3 of the Convention ratified by this law, it is not bound by paragraph 2 of the same article of the Convention. 2. The Hellenic Republic declares that the competent Central Authority to which applications pursuant to chapter IV of the Convention are addressed is the Ministry of Justice and that every relevant request, as well as its accompanying documents shall be translated into the Greek language.”
|
GuatemalaGuatemala (a) Pursuant to article 44, paragraph 6 (a), the Republic of Guatemala regards this Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition; (b) Pursuant to article 46, paragraph 13, the Republic of Guatemala notifies that the Public Minister is designated as central authority to receive requests for mutual legal assistance; (c) Pursuant to article 46, paragraph 14, the Republic of Guatemala notifies that Spanish is the language acceptable for receiving requests for mutual legal assistance.
|
IsraelIsrael “ Declaration regarding Article 6 (3) of the Convention: The Government of the State of Israel informs that the authorities that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption are: The Ministry of Justice, 29 Tzalach A-Din St, P.O.B. 49029, Jerusalem, Zip Code 91490 and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 9 Rabin St. P.O.B. 3013 Jerusalem, Zip Code 91035.” “Declaration regarding Article 44 (6) of the Convention: Israel’s extradition law requires an extradition agreement in order for extradition to occur. Under Section 2A [c] of Israel’s Extradition Law, an agreement can include a special agreement concluded between the State of Israel and the requesting State concerning the extradition of a wanted person, pursuant to the provisions of the Extradition Law. With respect to States Parties with which the State of Israel presently has an extradition treaty, extradition for the offenses under the Convention shall be undertaken pursuant to the requirements of those treaties. With respect to States Parties with which the State of Israel does not have an extradition treaty, it shall not in every case consider the Convention as the legal basis for extradition cooperation with such States Parties but shall consider each request for extradition for an offence under the Convention with due seriousness in light of the purposes and provisions of this Convention and may elect to extradite in such cases pursuant to a special agreement with the State Party, pursuant to Israeli law and upon a basis of reciprocity.” “Declaration Regarding Article 46 (13) of the Convention: Requests for mutual legal assistance in criminal cases should be addressed to the International Department in the State Attorney’s Office, Ministryof Justice, 7 Machal st. P.O.B. 49123, Jerusalem, Zip Code 97765.” “Declaration Regarding Article 46 (14) of the Convention: Requests for legal assistance must be submitted either in Hebrew or in English.”
|
JordanJordan 22 May 2009 "..., in accordance with article 6, paragraph 3 of the Convention, the “Anti-Corruption Commission” in Jordan is the authority that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption. The Permanent Mission of Jordan in this regard, has the honour to provide the contact details of the commission, as follows: Tel. No.: +962-6-5503150 Fax No.: +962-6-5540391 E-mail: dewan@jacc.gov.jo"
|
KazakhstanKazakhstan 27 June 2008 1. In accordance with article 44, paragraph 6 (a) of the Convention, the Republic of Kazakhstan takes the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to the Convention. 2. In accordance with article 46, paragraph 14 of the Convention, requests for mutual legal assistance and communications related thereto which are sent to the Republic of Kazakhstan must be accompanied by translations into the Kazakh and Russian languages, unless otherwise established by an international treaty ratified by the Republic of Kazakhstan.
|
KenyaKenya 14 August 2008 With notifications made under articles 6(3), 44(6), 46(13) and 46(14): “In accordance to Article 6 (3), the authority in Kenya that may assist other State Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption is: Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission Integrity Centre Milimani/Valley Road Junction P.O. Box 61130-00200, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel (General): +254-20-2717318 Hot Line: +254-20-2717468/+254-727-285663/ +254-733-520641 Fax: +254-20-2719757 Hot Fax: +254-20-2717473 E-mail: kacc@integrity.go.ke / report@integrity.go.ke Website: http://www.kacc.go.ke Correspondence with the Commission should be addressed to: The Directory/Chief Executive. In terms of Article 44 (6) (a) of the Convention, the Republic of Kenya declares that it does not consider the Convention as a legal basis for co-operation on extradition with other States Parties since Kenya’s municipal law (especially The Extradition (Contiguous) and Foreign Countries Act (Cap 76) and the Extradition (Commonwealth Countries) Act (Cap 77) requires the existence of a bilateral treaty between Kenya and another state as a condition precedent to extradition proceedings. The Republic of Kenya declares that pursuant to Article 46 (13) above, the Central Authority responsible and authorized to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution shall be: The Attorney General State Law Office Harambee Avenue P.O. Box 40112-00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-2227461 Fax: +254-20 2211082 Website: http://www.attorney-general.go.ke E-mail: info@ag.go.ke Pursuant to Article 46 (14) of the Convention, the language acceptable to the Republic of Kenya for purposes ofmutual legal assistance requests is English.”
|
KuwaitKuwait In accordance with article 44, paragraph 6 (a), of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, We hereby declare in the name of the State of Kuwait that by this instrument the Convention is considered as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to the Convention. In accordance with article 46, paragraph 13, of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, We hereby declare in the name of the State of Kuwait that by this instrument the Ministry of Justice is the central authority concerned with receiving requests for mutual legal assistance. 24 July 2007 Article 6, paragraph 3: The State of Kuwait has no designated authority that would enable it to assist other States parties in the formulation and implementation of specific anti-corruption measures. Article 46, paragraph 14: The languages acceptable to the State of Kuwait are Arabic and English.
|
Lao People's Democratic RepublicLao People's Democratic Republic “The Lao People’s Democratic Republic declares that it makes extradition conditional on the existence of a treaty. Nevertheless, it does not consider the UN Convention Against Corruption as the legal basis for extradition in respect of the offences set forth therein. It further declares that bilateral agreements will be the basis for extradition as between the Lao People’s Democratic Republic and other States Parties in respect of any offences.”
|
LatviaLatvia Notification under article 6 (3) "...the Republic of Latvia declares that the authority that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures is: Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau Alberta Str. 13, Riga, LV-1010 Latvia Phone: +371 7356161 Fax: +371 7331150 E-mail: knab@knab.gov.lv Notification under article 44 (6) "...the Republic of Latvia will take this Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to this Convention." Notification under article 46 (13) "...the Republic of Latvia declares that the authority which shall have the responsibility and power to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution under Article 46 is: Ministry of Justice Brivibas blvd. 36, Riga, LV-1536 Latvia Phone: +371 7036801 Fax: +371 7285575 E-mail: tm.kanceleja@tm.gov.lv Notification under article 46 (14) "...the Republic of Latvia declares that requests and supplementary documents addressed to the Republic of Latvia shall be sent together with their translation in Latvian." 5 June 2009 "…[The Republic of Latvia]…has the honour to inform the Secretary General of alterations that have been made regarding telephone and fax numbers of the national authorities of the Republic of Latvia designated in accordance with Article 6 (3) and Article 46 (13) of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption: Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau (Art. 6 (3)) Phone: +371 67 356161 Fax: +371 67 331150 Ministry of Justice (Art. 46 (13)) Phone: +371 67 036801 Fax: +371 67 285575"
|
LithuaniaLithuania “The Republic of Lithuania has designated the Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania as a national competent authority that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption, in accordance with paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, adopted by the General Assembly Resolution of 31 October 2003. Address: Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania A.Jakto st. 6, Vilnius, LT--01105, Republic of Lithuania Phone : (+370 5) 266 3335 Fax : (+370 5) 266 3307, E-mail: sst@stt.lt [...] it is provided in subparagraph a) of paragraph 6 of Article 44 of the Convention, the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania declares that the Republic of Lithuania shall consider this Convention a legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to the Convention; however, the Republic of Lithuania in no case shall consider the Convention a legal basis for the extradition of Lithuanian nationals, as it is stipulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania; [...] it is provided in paragraph 13 of Article 46 of the Convention, the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania declares that the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania and the Prosecutor General's Offfice of the Republic of Lithuania shall be designated as central authorities to receive requests for mutual legal assistance; [...] it is provided in paragraph 14 of Article 46 of the Convention, the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania declares that requests for legal assistance and documents pertaining thereto, which shall be submitted to the Republic of Lithuania, should be accompanied by respective translations into English, Russian or Lithuanian, in case the aforementioned documents are not in one of these languages.”
|
LuxembourgLuxembourg 21 December 2007 The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg declares that it takes the United Nations Convention against Corruption as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties.
7 February 2008 1. Notification on the basis of article 46, paragraph 13, of the Convention: The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg designates: Parquet Général auprès de la Cour Supérieure de Justice B.P. 15 L-2010 Luxembourg Tel.: (+352) 47 59 81-336 Fax: (+352) 47 05 50 parquet.general@justice.etat.lu as the central authority responsible for receiving requests for mutual legal assistance or transmitting them to the competent authorities of another State party to the Convention for execution. 2. Notification on the basis of article 46, paragraph 14, of the Convention: The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg accepts written requests for mutual legal assistance in the German, French or English languages or accompanied by a translation into one of these languages. Furthermore, I have the honour to inform you, on the basis of article 6, paragraph 3, of the Convention, that article 2 of the Act of 1 August 2007 on the approval of the aforementioned Convention has established a committee for the prevention of corruption (known as COPRECO). The committee is able to assist other States parties to develop and implement specific measures for the prevention of corruption. The following is the contact information for the committee: Comité de prévention de la corruption Monsieur Luc Reding 13, rue Erasme L-1468 Luxembourg Tel.: (+352) 2478-4555 Fax: (+352) 22 05 19 luc.reding@mj.etat.lu
|
MaliMali The Republic of Mali, pursuant to Article 44 (6), notifies that this Convention will constitute the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to this Convention.
|
MaltaMalta "1. In accordance with, paragraph 3 of Article 6 the authority designated to assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption is – The Permanent Commission against Corruption, The Palace, Valletta, Malta. 2. In accordance with, paragraph 13 of Article 46 the central authority designated in pursuance of this article is the Office of the Attorney General, Attorney General’s Chambers, The Palace, Valletta, Malta. 3. Pursuant to Article 46.14, the Government of Malta declares that requests and annexed documents should be addressed to it accompanied by a translation in English. 4. Pursuant to Article 44.6, the Government of Malta declares that it does not take this convention as the legal basis for co-operation on extradition with other State Parties."
|
MauritiusMauritius "The Government of the Republic of Mauritius wishes to inform the Secretary-General of the following notifications pursuant to Articles 6 (3), 44 (6), 46 (13) and 46 (14), of the Convention. Article 6 (3) The contact details of the authority in Mauritius that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption are as follows: The Commissioner The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) Marine Road, Quay D Round About, Port Louis Republic of Mauritius Tel: (230) 217-1640/45/48 or 217-1655/56 Fax: (230) 217 1643 Hotline 800 4222 Email: contact@icac.mu Web: http://www.icac.mu Article 44 (6) Mauritius makes extradition conditional on the existence of a treaty. The Extradition Act does not at present allow Mauritius to take the Convention as the legal basis for co-operation on extradition with other States Parties to the Convention. Article 46 (13) The central authority designated to receive requests for mutual legal assistance is the Attorney General. Address: Attorney General's Office 4th Floor, Renaganaden Seeneevassen Building Jules Koenig Street Port Louis Mauritius Tel: (230) 208-7234, (230) 212-2132 Fax: (230) 211 8084 E-mail: sgo@mail.gov.mu Article 46 (14) The acceptable languages are English (preferably) and French.
|
MongoliaMongolia 7 August 2008 With regard to the notifications made under articles 6(3), 44(6), 46(13) and 46(14): “1. Pursuant to with Article 6 (3) of the UN Convention against Corruption: The authority that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption is the Independent Authority against Corruption of Mongolia. Independent Authority against Corruption of Mongolia Sukhbaatar district, Seoul Street – 41, Ulaanbaatar 14250, Mongolia. Tel/Fax: 976 70112460 E-mail: comcor@iaac.mn Web page: www.iaac.mn 2. Pursuant to Article 44 (6) of the Convention: Mongolia will take the UN Convention against Corruption as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to the Convention. Mongolia will not extradite its’ own citizens. 3. Pursuant to Article 46 (13) of the Convention: The central authority that shall have the responsibility and power to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution is the Ministry of Justice and Home Affairs of Mongolia. Ministry of Justice and Home Affairs of Mongolia Trade Street 6/1 Ulaanbaatar 210646, Mongolia. Tel: 976 11 267014, Fax: 976 11 325225 E-mail: admin@mojha.gov.mn Web page: www.mojha.gov.mn 4. Pursuant to article 46 (14) of the Convention: The requests and supporting documents on legal assistance should be submitted in the Mongolian language or either of the UN official languages, English or Russian.”
|
MontenegroMontenegro 12 February 2007 "Pursuant to the Article 6 (3) of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the authority that may assist other State Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption is: The Agency for Anti-Corruption Initiative of the Republic of Montenegro Rimski trg 45, 81 000 Podgorica, Montenegro, Pursuant to the Article 44 (6), the Convention can be the legal basis for the cooperation on extradition with the other State Parties, Pursuant to the Article 46 (13), The Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Montenegro Vuka karadzica 3, 81 000 Podgorica, Montenegro, is the central body responsible for the request for the international legal assistance, and that Pursuant to the Article 46 (14), the language of forwarding legal assistance request can be both English and the official language in Montenegro."
|
MozambiqueMozambique 4 November 2008 “Pursuant to the provisions of Article 46, paragraphs 13 and 14 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the Republic of Mozambique declares that the Attorney’s General Office of the Republic of Mozambique is the central authority designated to receive requests of legal mutual assistance and cooperation in the framework of the Convention, and that the Portuguese and English languages are the acceptable languages. Furthermore, with regard to Article 44 of the Convention, the Republic of Mozambique declares that: ‘In accordance with its Constitution, the Republic of Mozambique can not extradite Mozambican citizens. The Constitution does not allow the extradition of foreign citizens that, according to the laws of the requesting State, could be subjected to death penalty or life imprisonment. Foreign citizens also can not be extradited whenever there is serious ground to believe that they may be subjected to torture, inhumane, degrading or cruel treatment’.”
|
NetherlandsNetherlands 4 November 2009 Article 6 (3): "… the authority for The Netherlands that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption is: Public Sector Employment Affairs Department Directorate-General for Governance and Kingdom Relations Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations P.O. Box 20011 2500 EA The Hague The Netherlands"
|
NicaraguaNicaragua 25 October 2006 In accordance with the provisions of article 46 (13) of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the Government of the Republic of Nicaragua declares that the Attorney General of the Republic is designated as the central authority competent to receive requests for mutual legal assistance.
|
NorwayNorway 21 September 2006 " Article 6 (3) In Norway the authorities that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption are: The Royal Ministry of Justice and the Police, P.O. Box 8005 Dep, N-0030 Oslo The Royal Ministry of Finance, P.O. Box Dep, N-0030 Oslo Article 46 (13) The Norwegian authority responsible for receiving requests for mutual legal assistance in accordance with article 46 (13) is: The Royal Ministry of Justice and the Police, P.O. Box 8005 Dep, N-0030 Oslo Article 46 (14) Norway will accept requests in English, Danish and Swedish in addition to Norwegian."
|
PakistanPakistan “Article 6 (3) ... the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan nominates National Accountability Bureau as the authority which will develop and implement specific anti-corruption measures in the country and cooperate at international level. Address: National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Ata Turk Avenue, G-5/2, Islamabad www/nab.gov.pk Telephone + 92-51-920 8165 Fax + 92-51-921 4502 Article 44 (6) ... the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan declares that pursuant to Article 44, Paragraph 6, of the Convention, it does not take this Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties. Article 46 (13) ..., the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan designates National Accountability Bureau as a central authority to receive all requests for mutual legal assistance from other States Parties under the Convention. All such requests shall be in English or shall be accompanied by an official translation in English."
|
PanamaPanama ...the Republic of Panama will take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties to the Convention. ...the Office of the Attorney-General is the central authority responsible for receiving and implementing requests for mutual legal assistance. ... the Republic of Panama considers that, for requests for legal assistance, the acceptable language is Spanish.
|
ParaguayParaguay Pursuant to article 44 (6) (a) of the Convention, I have the honour to inform you that the Republic of Paraguay will take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties to the Convention. Pursuant to the provisions of article 46 (13) of the aforementioned Convention, I hereby notify you that the Republic of Paraguay has designated the following institution as its central authority: Central authority:Government Procurator's Department - Office of the Attorney-General Department responsible: Department of International Affairs and External Legal Assistance Director: Juan Emilio Oviedo Cabañas Address: 737 Nuestra Señora de la Asunción, between Víctor Haedo and Humaitá Telephone: 595-21-415 5000, extensions 162 and 157; 595-21-415 5100; 595-21 454603 e-mail: jeoviedo@ministeriopublico.gov.py Pursuant to the terms of article 46 (14) of the Convention, the Republic of Paraguay considers that, for requests for mutual legal assistance and any other relevant communication, the Spanish language is acceptable or, failing that, officially certified translations into Spanish.
|
PhilippinesPhilippines 14 December 2006 "In accordance with Article 6, paragraph 3, the Republic of the Philippines declares that the authorities for assisting other States in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption are: Office of the Ombudsman Agham Road, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines Commission on Audit Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City, Philippines In accordance with Article 44, paragraph 6, the Republic of the Philippines declares that dual criminality is required under its extradition law and the Philippines therefore cannot consider the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States. In accordance with Article 46, paragraphs 13 and 14, the Republic of the Philippines declares that if the request involves a State Party which has a bilateral treaty on mutual legal assistance with the Philippines, the Central Authority which shall have the power to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or transmit them to the competent authorities for execution is: The Department of Justice Padre Faura Street, Manila, Philippines In the absence of a bilateral treaty, the Central Authority shall be: Office of the Ombudsman Agham Road, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines The acceptable language for requests for mutual assistance is English."
|
PolandPoland 13 October 2006 "Pursuant to article 46, paragraph 13, the Republic of Poland declares that the Ministry of Justice is designed as the central authority competent to receive requests for mutual legal assistance. Pursuant to article 44, paragraph 6, the Republic of Poland regards the aforementioned Convention as a legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties of the Convention. The Republic of Poland declares that Polish and English shall be the languages acceptable pursuant to article 46, paragraph 14 of the Convention."
26 June 2009
Notification under article 6 (3): 1. National Prosecutor’s Office; Bureau for Organized Crime Address: ul. Barska 28/30; 02-315 Warsaw. Poland Tel.: 00 48 22 31 89 700 Fax: 00 48 22 31 89 701 2. Central Anticorruption Bureau, Department of International Cooperation of the Chief’s Office; Address: Al. Ujazdowskie 9; 00-583 Warsaw, Poland Tel.: 00 48 22 43 71 130; 00 48 22 43 71 131 Fax: 00 48 22 33 10 795 E-mail: cba080@cba.gov.pl 3. National Police Headquarters; Division for combating corruption of the Criminal Investigation Bureau; Address: ul. Pulawska 148/150; 02-624 Warsaw, Poland; Tel.: 00 48 22 72 15 090 Fax: 00 48 22 72 12 676 E-mail: korupcja-kgp@policja.gov.pl.”
|
Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea The Republic of Korea, pursuant to Article 46 (13) of the Convention, notifies the Secretary-General of the United Nations that the Minister of Justice is designated as the central authority for mutual legal assistance under the Convention. It also notifies the Secretary-General, pursuant to Article 46 (14) of the Convention, that requests for mutual legal assistance under the Convention should be made in, or accompanied by a translation into, the Korean or the English language. 21 April 2008
Article 6 (3) “Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission Imgwang Building 81, Uiju-ro, Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Republic of Korea, #120-705”
|
RomaniaRomania "In accordance with Article 46, paragraph 13, of the Convention, Romania declares that the central authorities responsible for receiving requests for mutual legal assistance are: a) the Prosecutor's Office to the High Court of Cassation and Justice for the requests formulated in criminal investigation and prosecution; b) the Ministry of Justice for the requests formulated during the trial and execution of punishment, and for receiving requests for extradition and transfer of sentenced persons."
|
Russian FederationRussian Federation ... 2) The Russian Federation declares, in accordance with article 44, paragraph 6, subparagraph (a) of the Convention, that it will take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to the Convention, on a foundation of reciprocity; ... 5) The Russian Federation declares, on the basis of the last sentence of article 46, paragraph 13, of the Convention, that it will, on a foundation of reciprocity and in urgent circumstances, accept requests for mutual legal assistance and communications through the International Criminal Police Organization, provided that the documents containing such requests and communications are dispatched without delay in the prescribed manner; 6) The Russian Federation declares, in accordance with article 46, paragraph 14, of the Convention, that requests for mutual legal assistance and communications related thereto addressed to the Russian Federation must be accompanied by translations into Russian, unless otherwise established by an international agreement of the Russian Federation or unless otherwise arranged between the central authority of the Russian Federation and the central authority of the other State Party to the Convention; ... 7 January 2009 … in accordance with paragraph 13 of Article 46 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, adopted on 31 October 2003, the following authorities of the Russian Federation were designated to implement the provisions of this Convention with regard to mutual legal assistance: Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation – on the proceedings in civil matters, including those relating to civil aspects of the criminal offences, the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation on all other matters.
|
SerbiaSerbia 12 May 2008 With regard to the nofication made under article 46(13): “…..pursuant to article 46, paragraph 13 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the central authority of the Republic of Serbia for receiving requests for mutual legal assistance, acting on them and transmission to the competent authorities for execution is the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Serbia.”
|
SeychellesSeychelles "That, under Article 44.6 (a) of the Convention, the Republic of Seychelles will not take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition, and That in accordance with Article 46.13 of the Convention, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been designated the competent authority to receive requests for mutual assistance and transmit them to the central authority for execution."
|
SingaporeSingapore “1. Pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 3 of the above mentioned Convention, the Government of the Republic of Singapore designates the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau of Singapore as the authority that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption. The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau of Singapore can be contacted through the following means: Address: 2 Lengkok Bahru Singapore 159047 Tel: +(65)-6270-0141; Fax: +(65)-6270-0320 Email: cpib website email@cpib.gov.sg 2. Pursuant to Article 44, paragraph 6 of the above mentioned Convention, the Government of the Republic of Singapore declares that it does not take the above mentioned convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties. 3. Pursuant to Article 46, paragraph 13 of the above mentioned Convention, the Government of the Republic of Singapore designates the Attorney-General of Singapore as the central authority for the purposes of mutual legal assistance in accordance with Article 46 of the said Convention. 4. Pursuant to Article 46, paragraph 14 of the above mentioned Convention, the Government of the Republic of Singapore declares that requests and attachments thereto addressed to the central authority of Singapore should be in the English language, or a translation into the English language should be attached thereto.”
|
SlovakiaSlovakia “Pursuant to article 46, paragraphs 13 and 14 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the Slovak Republic notifies that the central authority of the Slovak Republic responsible for receiving requests for mutual legal assistance is the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic and the acceptable languages are Slovak and English.”
|
SloveniaSlovenia Upon Accession “WHEREAS PURSUANT TO Article 44, paragraph 6, subparagraph (a) of the Convention, the Republic of Slovenia takes the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to the Convention; WHEREAS PURSUANT TO Article 46, paragraph 13 of the Convention, the central authority in the Republic of Slovenia that shall have the responsibility and power to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution is the Ministry of Justice; AND WHEREAS PURSUANT TO Article 46, paragraph 14 of the Convention, the languages acceptable to the Republic of Slovenia are Slovenian, English and French”.
27 July 2009 Notification under article 6 (3): «In accordance with Article 6, Paragraph 3 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption the preventive anti-corruption body in the Republic of Slovenia is the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption. Address: Commission for the Prevention of Corruption Dunajska cesta 56 1000 Ljubljana T:+386 1 478 84 83 F:+386 1 478 84 72 E : anti.korupcija@kpk-rs.si.»
|
South AfricaSouth Africa "... in terms of Article 44 (6) of the Convention it is approved that South Africa uses the Convention as the legal basis for co-operation on extradition with other States Parties to the Convention. ... it is approved that the Director-General of the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development is the designated Central Authority to receive requests for mutual legal assistance in terms of article 46 (13) of the Convention."
|
SpainSpain 26 March 2007 ... in accordance with article 46 (13), the central authority to receive requests for mutual assistance is the following: Subdirección General de Cooperación Jurídica Internacional Ministerio de Justicia Calle San Bernardo, 62 C.O. 28015 MADRID
|
SwedenSweden 10 September 2008
Notifications under articles 6 (3) and 44 (6): "... Article 6 (3) The Swedish authority that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption is: The Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, (Sida) Valhallavägen 199 SE-105 25 STOCKHOLM Sweden sida@sida.se Article 44 (6) Sweden does not make extradition conditional on the existence of a treaty. Extradition of aliens is regulated by national legislation.”
27 October 2009 Article 46 (13) “The contact details of the Swedish Central Authority are as follows: Ministry of Justice Division for Criminal Cases and International Judicial Co-operation SE-103 39 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN E-mail: birs@justice.ministry.se”
|
SwitzerlandSwitzerland The central authority designated by Switzerland to receive requests for mutual legal assistance under Article 46, paragraph 13 of this Convention is: Office fédéral de la justice Bundesrain 20 CH-3003 Berne. Pursuant to Article 46, paragraph 14 of that Convention, requests for mutual legal assistance and the documents attached thereto must be sent to Switzerland together with their certified translation into French, German or Italian, if they have not been established in one of these languages.
|
The former Yugoslav Republic of MacedoniaThe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 16 April 2008 “In accordance with Article 6, paragraph 3, of the above mentioned Convention, competent authorities of Republic of Macedonia that may assist other States Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption, are: the State commission for the Suppression of Corruption and the Primary Public Prosecutor’s Office for prosecuting organized crime and corruption. In accordance with Article 44, paragraph 6, subparagraph (a) of the Convention, the Republic of Macedonia will take this Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States Parties to this Convention. In accordance with Article 46, paragraph 13 of the Convention, the central authority responsible and authorized to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution is the Ministry of Justice – Department for international legal assistance. Pursuant to Article 46, paragraph 14 of the Convention, the language acceptable to the Republic of Macedonia is Macedonian.”
|
UgandaUganda 20 October 2009 "Pursuant ot article 6, paragraph 3 of the Convention, the authorities handling the prevention of corruption are: Ministry of Ethics and Integrity P.O.Box 7142 Kampala Inspectorate General of Government P.O.Box 1682 Tel: 259723/348613/347387 Website: www.igg.go.ug The Office of the Auditor General P.O.Box 7083 Tel: 256-414-344340 Email: infor@aog.go.ug Website: www.oag.go.ug"
|
United States of AmericaUnited States of America "Pursuant to article 6, paragraph 3 of the Convention, [the United States notifies] that the authorities are: The Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice 810 7th Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20531 and The Department of State Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Anticorruption Unit 2201 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20520. Pursuant to Article 44, paragraph 6, of the Convention, ... the United States will not apply Article 44, paragraph 5. Pursuant to Article 46, paragraph 13, of the Convention, ... the Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Office of International Affairs, is designated as the central authority for mutual legal assistance under the Convention. Pursuant to Article 46, paragraph 14, of the Convention, ... requests for mutual legal assistance under the Convention should be made in, or accompanied by a translation into, the English language."
|
UruguayUruguay 12 April 2007 - Article 6, paragraph 3: Dr. Adolfo Perez Piera and Beatriz Pereira de Pólito, President and Vice-President of the State Advisory Board on Economic and Financial Affairs (Rincón 528, piso 8, Montevideo, Uruguay; tel.: 011 5982 917 0407; fax.: 011 5982 917 0407 ext. 15; e-mail: secretaria@jasesora.gub.uy); - Article 44, paragraph 6: While Uruguay does not necessarily make extradition conditional on the existence of a treaty, it has incorporated the United Nations Convention against Corruption into its domestic legal order and will therefore take the Convention as the legal basis for cooperation on extradition with other States parties; - Article 46, paragraph 13: In accordance with Act No. 17,060 of 22 October 1998 (articles 34 and 35), requests for international legal cooperation on criminal matters from foreign authorities must be addressed to the Central Advisory Board on International Legal Cooperation, which is currently attached to the Department of Constitutional and Legal Affairs of the Ministry of Education and Culture; - Article 46, paragraph 14: Spanish and English
|
UzbekistanUzbekistan 1 August 2008 “…..to paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Convention: The Republic of Uzbekistan notifies that the Office of Prosecutor General, Ministry of Internal Affairs, National Security Service and Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan shall be defined as the authorities that may assist other State Parties in developing and implementing specific measures for the prevention of corruption… ….. to paragraph 6 of Article 44 of the Convention: In accordance with subparagraph “ä” of paragraph 6 of the article 44 the Republic of Uzbekistan notifies that it shall use this Convention as a legal basis for cooperation on extradition of persons, who committed corruption crimes, with other State Parties of this Convention on a foundation of reciprocity… to Article 46 of the Convention: (a) paragraph 13. The Republic of Uzbekistan notifies that the Office of Prosecutor General shall be defined as a central authority responsible to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and execute them, or to transfer them to the competent authorities of the Republic of Uzbekistan for execution… (b) paragraph 14. The Republic of Uzbekistan notifies that the Uzbek, Russian and English languages shall be defined as acceptable upon filing requests for mutual legal assistance…”
|
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Concerning the provisions of article 46, paragraph 13, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela hereby designates the Public Prosecutor’s Office as the central authority with the responsibility and power to receive requests for mutual legal assistance and either to execute them or to transmit them to the competent authorities for execution. With regard to paragraph 14 of the same article, it hereby provides notification that the acceptable language for such requests shall be Spanish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End Note
|
1. In accordance with the provisions of Article 153 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and Article 138 of the Basic Law of the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, the Government of the People's Republic of China decides that the Convention shall apply to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.
|
2. With the following territorial exclusion: ... until further decision, the Convention shall not apply to the Faeroe Islands or to Greenland.
|
3. On 14 August 2008, the Republic of Kenya lodged a reservation with the Secretary-General that was circulated by depositary notification C.N.643.2008.TREATIES-25 of 11 September 2008. This reservation, which had not been accepted for deposit awaiting the procedure envisaged in the above depositary notification, has now been withdrawn. The withdrawal was effected on 9 September 2009. The text of the reservation that was withdrawn reads as follows:
“In accordance with Article 66 (3) of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the Republic of Kenya declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of Article 66 of the Convention, which deals with the settlement of disputes arising between States Parties concerning the application of the Convention and referral to the International Court of Justice, because Kenya believes
that such disputes should be resolved through amicable negotiation or mediation or conciliation between the parties.”
|
4. See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
|
5. In a communication received on 4 November 2008, the Government of Mozambique informed the Secretary-General of the following:
“The Republic of Mozambique does not consider itself bound by the provision of Article 66, paragraph 2 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, which provides that any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention that cannot be settled through negotiation shall, at the request of one of those States Parties, be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice.
The Republic of Mozambique considers that no dispute of such nature may be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice without the consent of all parties to the dispute.”
|
6. For the Kingdom in Europe.
|
7. On 12 October 2006, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland informed the Secretary-General of the following:
"... the said Convention shall extend to the British Virgin Islands being a territory for whose international relations the Government of the United Kingdom is responsible.
The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland considers the extension of the United Nations Convention against Corruption to the British Virgin Islands to take effect from the date of deposit of this notification...".
Furthermore, on 9 November 2009, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland informed the Secretary-General of the following:
“… the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland wishes the United Kingdom’s Ratification of the Convention to be extended to the following territories for whose international relations the United Kingdom is responsible:
Bailiwick of Guernsey
Bailiwick of Jersey
Isle of Man
The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland considers the extension of the aforesaid Convention to take effect from the date of deposit of this notification … ”
|
8. Upon signing the Convention, the Government of Israel communcated the following with regard to the declaration made by the Government of Algeria upon ratification:
"The Government of the State of Israel has noted that the instrument of ratification of Algeria of the abovementioned Convention contains a declaration with respect to the State of Israel.
The Government of the State of Israel considers that such declaration, which is explicitly of a political nature, is incompatible with the purposes and objectives of the Convention.
The Government of the State of Israel therefore objects to the aforesaid declaration."
On 4 February 2009, upon ratification, the Government of Israel confirms the above communication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|